.
Posted: Fri Sep 30, 2011 11:26 pm.
Page 1 of 4
Posted: Fri Sep 30, 2011 11:26 pmRe: Gun removal poll.
Posted: Fri Sep 30, 2011 11:44 pmMeh!
Re: Gun removal poll.
Posted: Sat Oct 01, 2011 12:10 amOldmanFCSA wrote:neither of my two 50BMG rifles are styled or are used by the military
They are wood-stocked double rifles with exposed hammers?
Re: Gun removal poll.
Posted: Sat Oct 01, 2011 12:11 amEverybody knows it's only those evil .50 BMGs that the terrorists want. 
Re: Gun removal poll.
Posted: Sat Oct 01, 2011 2:10 amSince Heller has established that the 2nd Amendment does indeed protect an individual right to own firearms, now would be a good time to throw the whole militia clause back on the gun grabbers...
The first militia act (1792) explicitly stated that everyone mustering for militia duty must bring their own firearms & ammo, suitable for the common defense. This means that, at the very least, all small arms (including ammo) suitable for the common defense are explicitly protected and individuals must be allowed to "keep" them, on the off chance the 'reserve militia' (all males (citizens, in some states) capable of bearing arms who are not already in the active duty military, National or State Guards) is ever called upon for service...
The first militia act (1792) explicitly stated that everyone mustering for militia duty must bring their own firearms & ammo, suitable for the common defense. This means that, at the very least, all small arms (including ammo) suitable for the common defense are explicitly protected and individuals must be allowed to "keep" them, on the off chance the 'reserve militia' (all males (citizens, in some states) capable of bearing arms who are not already in the active duty military, National or State Guards) is ever called upon for service...
Re: Gun removal poll.
Posted: Sat Oct 01, 2011 4:42 amNot quite the same.....
Both .50BMG's
anti-aircraft.....
An M16.
An AR50
IF you can hit a moving aircraft at 150+ miles per hour with a bolt action or even a semi-auto rifle that is greater than 1 miles away with a series of shots at less than 25 rounds per minute.....
DAMN dude....you best market that skill.
I still want an M16 some day.
Both .50BMG's
anti-aircraft.....
An M16.
An AR50
IF you can hit a moving aircraft at 150+ miles per hour with a bolt action or even a semi-auto rifle that is greater than 1 miles away with a series of shots at less than 25 rounds per minute.....
DAMN dude....you best market that skill.
I still want an M16 some day.
Re: Gun removal poll.
Posted: Sat Oct 01, 2011 5:48 amWhen dumpling guns are outlawed....
How To Shoot Fighter Jets With Bavarian Dumplings And Win The War!
How To Shoot Fighter Jets With Bavarian Dumplings And Win The War!
Re: Gun removal poll.
Posted: Sat Oct 01, 2011 2:57 pmWho is saying yes to these?!
Re: Gun removal poll.
Posted: Sat Oct 01, 2011 3:18 pmThere are actually quite a few anti's registered here. They're trying to stay anonymous. But we know who they are.
Re: Gun removal poll.
Posted: Sat Oct 01, 2011 3:28 pmIt is also hypothetically theoretically possible that not absolutely everyone is answering seriously.
Re: Gun removal poll.
Posted: Sat Oct 01, 2011 3:38 pmBy definition, an "anti" would answer yes to any gun confiscation/removal. 
Re: Gun removal poll.
Posted: Sat Oct 01, 2011 3:51 pmOldmanFCSA wrote:
Note: neither of my two 50BMG rifles are styled or are used by the military - so I'm safe .................... Ya Right !!!!!!!!
Are they legal in California?
Re: Gun removal poll.
Posted: Sat Oct 01, 2011 7:14 pmThis poll is as useful as this post.
Re: Gun removal poll.
Posted: Mon Oct 03, 2011 10:31 amwhat is this poll even doing here, lock it.
Re: Gun removal poll.
Posted: Mon Oct 03, 2011 10:33 ammnblaster wrote:what is this poll even doing here, lock it.
It shows there are at least 25 people registered here that have some fundamental issues with the second amendment.