Page 1 of 1

Curios and Relics question

PostPosted: Fri Feb 09, 2024 11:31 am
by Lumpy
Recently I read the claim that under MN law Curios and Relics are an exception to the prohibition on owning full-auto firearms (besides law enforcement and licensed gun dealers). Is this correct, that in MN I can own a functioning full-auto firearm as long as it meets the ATF definition of a C&R?

Re: Curios and Relics question

PostPosted: Fri Feb 09, 2024 12:15 pm
by xd ED
That is essentially correct.
It needs to be listed as an C & R Firearm.

BATF Curios or Relics List


and here's one you could own:

Image

Colt 1928 Navy Thompson Submachine Gun
$75,000.00

Machine Guns For Sale

Re: Curios and Relics question

PostPosted: Fri Feb 09, 2024 2:23 pm
by bstrawse
Lumpy wrote:Recently I read the claim that under MN law Curios and Relics are an exception to the prohibition on owning full-auto firearms (besides law enforcement and licensed gun dealers). Is this correct, that in MN I can own a functioning full-auto firearm as long as it meets the ATF definition of a C&R?


Correct
b

Re: Curios and Relics question

PostPosted: Fri Feb 09, 2024 2:59 pm
by crbutler
Kind of sort of.

Firstly, they don’t treat them as curios and relics, they are treated as class III weapons, so a c&r license does not authorize transfer.

If you do get one you also have to register it with the state BCA.

One thing that I find kind of curious about the whole c&r thing is it’s a specific list, sometimes down to specific serial numbers… even though by now ANYTHING legally transferable to individuals is more than 30 years out, most much more so.

Re: Curios and Relics question

PostPosted: Fri Feb 09, 2024 4:38 pm
by Lumpy
Which leads me to another question: how much can a C&R be refurbished or repaired before it would no longer be considered the same gun; i.e. the "Ship of Theseus" question?

Re: Curios and Relics question

PostPosted: Fri Feb 09, 2024 9:52 pm
by warrlac
crbutler wrote:Kind of sort of.

Firstly, they don’t treat them as curios and relics, they are treated as class III weapons, so a c&r license does not authorize transfer.

If you do get one you also have to register it with the state BCA.

One thing that I find kind of curious about the whole c&r thing is it’s a specific list, sometimes down to specific serial numbers… even though by now ANYTHING legally transferable to individuals is more than 30 years out, most much more so.


I have a C&R FFL. It is my understanding that the ATF did away with any sort of list quite a few years ago.

The magic number is 50 years old. For example, that means that a 1973 Browning Auto-5 could be transferred as a C&R firearm today.

Note that many Sellers refuse to sell them as C&R items and make you go through a Type 1 FFL anyway. There are advantages to having a C&R when it comes to bidding on vintage military firearms (sometime sold in lots at auction).

Re: Curios and Relics question

PostPosted: Fri Feb 09, 2024 10:03 pm
by xd ED
Lumpy wrote:Which leads me to another question: how much can a C&R be refurbished or repaired before it would no longer be considered the same gun; i.e. the "Ship of Theseus" question?


That is the first question addressed in the FAQs of the linked document I previously posted.
The short answer is that repairs can be made, and parts replaced as long as it stay’s essentially in original form.

Re: Curios and Relics question

PostPosted: Sat Feb 10, 2024 1:39 pm
by crbutler
warrlac wrote:
crbutler wrote:Kind of sort of.

Firstly, they don’t treat them as curios and relics, they are treated as class III weapons, so a c&r license does not authorize transfer.

If you do get one you also have to register it with the state BCA.

One thing that I find kind of curious about the whole c&r thing is it’s a specific list, sometimes down to specific serial numbers… even though by now ANYTHING legally transferable to individuals is more than 30 years out, most much more so.


I have a C&R FFL. It is my understanding that the ATF did away with any sort of list quite a few years ago.

The magic number is 50 years old. For example, that means that a 1973 Browning Auto-5 could be transferred as a C&R firearm today.

Note that many Sellers refuse to sell them as C&R items and make you go through a Type 1 FFL anyway. There are advantages to having a C&R when it comes to bidding on vintage military firearms (sometime sold in lots at auction).


The ATF may have, but MN maintains a list of C&R eligible full auto items. It has to be on that list for individual transfer. Most of the weapons that have been stamped were stamped before 1973.

Getting a FFL that has the appropriate credentials exempts someone/a business from the C&R part in MN... but then it is not a transferable to individuals item. Your C&R license does not allow you to acquire full auto C&R weapons regardless of tax stamp situation. You do need to have a class III transfer dealer to do so.

Fundamentally it is possible to get machine guns in MN, just a limited subset of those that are allowed under federal law with some additional steps that the state requires.

Re: Curios and Relics question

PostPosted: Sat Feb 10, 2024 11:28 pm
by Holland&Holland
And a ton of money.