MNGunTalk.com

fingers wrote:

xd ED wrote:

fingers wrote:
Well, I wasn't certain that he was trying to force me into a false dichotomy, but I did assume it. I certainly can't predict the future with certainty. I have to admit I didn't pay attention to Clinton's stated stance on gun rights, if it was ever published. But with everything thusfar and now this, can things possibly be worse? What is it you like about this guy, just curious.

You participate on a forum of firearms enthusiasts and you didn't know the candidates in most recent presidential election, or their respective stances on gun rights, and the second amendment? Is that what I'm being asked to believe?

I'm not sure how I (or Clinton) ever becomes the topic of conversation when a person criticizes Trump. Its magic how people do that. I didn't even see it happening and I'm still not sure how it happened. But anyway, if you must, you can believe I could care less about Trump's views concerning anything, nor could I care less about Clinton's views concerning anything. Now that we have those issues out of the way - lets talk Trump. What do you like about him? I'll take any answer. Even if you like something about him that I don't like, I will accept it. Just as long as you can come up with anything at all that I can somewhat wrap my head around. You do realize we are talking about Donald Trump, right??

xd ED wrote:I think this became about you, and hillary not because you criticized Trump, but rather due to your stated (and I assume feigned) ignorance.
Trump wasn't my 1st, or even third choice, but I voted for him.
I think more of him, generally, now than before he was elected, because as others have said, he's not a pc politician who stays within the lines.
Why would you want to "talk Trump", as you write: "...I could care less about Trump's views concerning anything...".
In fact, given your similar sentiment about Clinton, why engage in political discussion at all?

As president, Hillary will:

Expand background checks to more gun sales—including by closing the gun show and internet sales loopholes—and strengthen the background check system by getting rid of the so-called “Charleston Loophole.”

Take on the gun lobby by removing the industry’s sweeping legal protection for illegal and irresponsible actions (which makes it almost impossible for people to hold them accountable), and revoking licenses from dealers who break the law.

Keep guns out of the hands of domestic abusers, other violent criminals, and the severely mentally ill by supporting laws that stop domestic abusers from buying and owning guns, making it a federal crime for someone to intentionally buy a gun for a person prohibited from owning one, and closing the loopholes that allow people suffering from severe mental illness to purchase and own guns. She will also support work to keep military-style weapons off our streets.


As senator, she co-sponsored and voted for legislation that would close the gun show loophole, voted against the dangerous immunity protections for gun dealers and manufacturers, and co-sponsored legislation to extend and reinstate the assault weapons ban.

INOR wrote:Ghost....isn’t that pretty much what trump was proposing the other day? Did he copy his playbook from Clinton?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

LarryFlew wrote:For a bit I thought the unicorn was back.

Amazi wrote:If a Republican went on a liberal forum and did something like this they would be banned in a matter of minutes.