Lunchbox wrote:How many felonies does it take before they keep this POS locked up?
609.065 JUSTIFIABLE TAKING OF LIFE.
The intentional taking of the life of another is not authorized by section 609.06, except when necessary in resisting or preventing an offense which the actor reasonably believes exposes the actor or another to great bodily harm or death, or preventing the commission of a felony in the actor's place of abode.
westhope wrote:609.065 JUSTIFIABLE TAKING OF LIFE.
The intentional taking of the life of another is not authorized by section 609.06, except when necessary in resisting or preventing an offense which the actor reasonably believes exposes the actor or another to great bodily harm or death, or preventing the commission of a felony in the actor's place of abode.
Was he commiting a felony at the time? I'm not sure if the door was open and if the amount of money was small.
Good job ladies. Glad it worked out well.
911scanner wrote:At what point does castle doctrine kick in? Isn't it reasonable to assume that any unwanted person in your home is there to commit a felony?
Unless they ask for Amy or Bob (no such person here) then turn around and run, I have to assume they're in my abode to rob, rape, pillage, maim or kill someone there. I would then be well within my rights to defend my family and myself.
Where exactly is the dividing line? Do I have to see a weapon or fist-a-cuffs or the carrying of jewelry or electronics? ...Paul...Tman...any lawyers...
westhope wrote:609.065 JUSTIFIABLE TAKING OF LIFE.
The intentional taking of the life of another is not authorized by section 609.06, except when necessary in resisting or preventing an offense which the actor reasonably believes exposes the actor or another to great bodily harm or death, or preventing the commission of a felony in the actor's place of abode.
Was he commiting a felony at the time? I'm not sure if the door was open and if the amount of money was small.
Good job ladies. Glad it worked out well.
tazdevil wrote:911scanner wrote:At what point does castle doctrine kick in? Isn't it reasonable to assume that any unwanted person in your home is there to commit a felony?
Unless they ask for Amy or Bob (no such person here) then turn around and run, I have to assume they're in my abode to rob, rape, pillage, maim or kill someone there. I would then be well within my rights to defend my family and myself.
Where exactly is the dividing line? Do I have to see a weapon or fist-a-cuffs or the carrying of jewelry or electronics? ...Paul...Tman...any lawyers...
Not a lawyer, but I know this much, castle doctrine does not exist in Minnesota. You have to prove bad guys where there to committ a violent felony on you/family before you can respond with deadly force.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 9 guests