maddhunter wrote:Great questions all. I was going to ask these same questions this morning myself. I am new to the "modern sporting rifle" world myself, so I am unsure what actually transpired during the most recent ban of 1994-2004. I assume all importation of military surplus semi-auto rifles was completely curtailed and I also assume U.S. manufacturers were not producing said weapons. Someone please share with me on that one.
My other question is what did owners of military style rifles do with theirs during the ban? Were they allowed to use them in public( shooting ranges,varmit hunting,etc) or did they just stand at attention in (hopefully) their respective gunsafes?
I don't know where we, as a community of law abiding gun enthusiats, are headed during these troubling times, but I do know that we need to have a united approach to fend off the anti's and their upcoming solutions. Do whatever you can to lend your support to our cause(petitions started by gun blogs as example). I do not believe it is too late!!!!!!!!!!
1994 ban had nothing to do with full auto. It addressed what were generically called "assault weapons" and "high capacity" magazines. These were banned from manufacture and new gun sales. Legal possession and sale of those guns and magazines already in existence were grandfathered."HIgh cap mags" meant anything over 10 rounds, so existing 20 and 30 (and other) magazines were no longer produced. Fixed supply and increasing demand meant they turned to gold.
Same with pre-existing/pre-ban "assault weapons". I forget the exact definition of "assault weapon" in the ban but it was something like this-- If a gun had 2 or more of the following characteristics/features, it was an "assault weapon"- Pistol grip, detachable magazine, collapsible stock, or flash hider. Manufacturers promptly removed the flash hiders and collapsible stocks and.....Voila! That scary and illegal AR15 assault weapon was now a safe and reasonable thing for normal people to own.
We could own and use our pre-1994 ban guns. And nothing really changed but the cost of shooting went up, the price of pre-ban stuff skyrocketed and some self satisfied Senators and bliss-ninnies did a congratulatory circle jerk. And the Republican party had a sweeping victory in the 1994 mid-term elections, taking a majority position in the House of Representatives for the first time in several decades.
Above applied to Federal level. A few states implemented their own bans. This kept the ban in effect in places like NY and CT. California went so far as to require registration of "assault weapons" because reasonable people would have no problem with that. And then outlawed possession a few years later and required owners to turn them in or prove that they had been sold out of the state. So much for reasonable