by river_boater on Sat Aug 10, 2013 8:32 pm
45Badger--I disagree, but this brings more questions.
First, all production firearms manufacturers use CNC to machine parts. Unless a part is just poorly designed, I really can't accept that there can be that much difference in fit or finish. Unless the piece is actually designed to fit poorly in it's assembly, I just don't see it happening. Besides, what would be the benefit to machining something to fit poorly?
Almost all production manufacturers are using highly-advanced chemistry and techniques in their finishes. AFAIK, the most current and popular is carbonitriding. Melonite, Sursulf, Arcor, Tufftride, Tenifer, and Koline are all the same thing, just different "trade" names.
When discussing handguns, in my opinion, accuracy is a non-issue. All production manufacturers rifle their barrels; they're all accurate. 50% of "accuracy" depends on the shooter, anyway. To me, a handgun is a weapon, shooting 1" groups is really not that important--hitting what I point it at is important.
Regarding custom guns, it's really not a fair or accurate comparison. I have a friend with an Christensen 1911. It's built like a watch. GLOCK, Sig, Springfield, and S&W could probably duplicate that level of "fit and finish," but why? And at what cost? Ford doesn't build every car to be a Bentley, because they aren't Bentleys.
My point is, amongst production guns, they are all pretty-much the same in terms or quality, fit, finish, and accuracy. Where they differ is in their designs. Comparing a GLOCK to a Christensen is pointless.
Incidentally, my same friend owns a Wilson, and the bottom of the slide edges are so sharp, I cut myself trying to put it back together. It also rattles like a can of washers when you shake it.