I'm commencing a serious research project as part of my major and have chosen as my subject the effects of lawful ownership of firearms by residents of Chicago—which trend is expected to grow dramatically in the next several years—on the rates of various Part I crimes within the city. Need and appreciate any help guys. I'm looking for more sources. So far, I'm drawing heavily on John Lott and the UCRs.
Specifically, I anticipate that my research will reveal:
1. There is a significant correlation between higher rates of lawful firearms ownership and lower rates of Part I crimes relative to areas with lower ownership rates.
2. Increased ownership in Chicago is likely to reduce the incidence of some crimes, such as home invasions, as has been observed in comparable communities.
3. However, the rate of unjustifiable homicides committed with firearms is likely to be reduced only slightly, if at all, as the majority of firearm-affected murders in Chicago are known or suspected to be gang-related, and are committed with unlawfully obtained weapons.
4. Nevertheless, there exists no empirical data which suggests that an increase of lawful ownership is likely to precede an increase in unjustifiable homicides in the city.
Really appreciate any help!