My response to "Community Impact Statement"

Gun related chat that doesn't fit in another forum

Re: My response to "Community Impact Statement"

Postby Lumpy on Wed Dec 17, 2014 4:06 pm

UnaStamus wrote:Lake St. and Chicago Ave S is 3rd Precinct, and is a high crime area for robberies, prostitution and heroin and crack dealing. It's also claimed by the 10's Bloods, but disputed by the Rolling 20's. Laundromats at late hours are where people do their drug business because it's easy to hide/ditch dope, and there's always an excuse to be there at any hour. Much easier than explaining why you're standing at the corner of an intersection at 1am and have been for the past two hours. It's also easier to defend yourself from an attack or drug robbery.

There's always a back story. This is not to mention the fact that someone buying a gun like that is illegal, and more often than not, the gun was obtained illegally from someone else; be it stolen or a straw purchase. Our goal as gun owners should be to advocate for harsher penalties for gun crimes, and it has been a platform that the NRA has been vocally supportive of. The whole "enforce the laws already on the books, don't make new ones" thing. This is one of those times when the laws on the books are being enforced.

If anyone is advocating for someone who routinely hangs out at Lake/Chicago for anything other than employment reasons to be able to carry a gun, they must not be spending much time there after hours.
I'm a little confused. Was he working in a carwash, working in a laundromat, or a non-employee hanging around in the laundromat? I took the original report to mean this was a guy at his job.
User avatar
Lumpy
 
Posts: 2723 [View]
Joined: Sat Dec 28, 2013 2:54 pm
Location: North of Lowry, West of Penn

Re: My response to "Community Impact Statement"

Postby jdege on Wed Dec 17, 2014 4:13 pm

UnaStamus wrote:If anyone is advocating for someone who routinely hangs out at Lake/Chicago for anything other than employment reasons to be able to carry a gun, they must not be spending much time there after hours.

Most of the local SF community "hangs out" at Lake/Chicago, and has ever since Uncle Hugo's moved their from their old place at 4th and Franklin.
User avatar
jdege
 
Posts: 4483 [View]
Joined: Sun Jul 29, 2007 10:07 am

Re: My response to "Community Impact Statement"

Postby UnaStamus on Thu Dec 18, 2014 12:56 am

Lumpy wrote:I'm a little confused. Was he working in a carwash, working in a laundromat, or a non-employee hanging around in the laundromat? I took the original report to mean this was a guy at his job.

Image


jdege wrote:
UnaStamus wrote:If anyone is advocating for someone who routinely hangs out at Lake/Chicago for anything other than employment reasons to be able to carry a gun, they must not be spending much time there after hours.

Most of the local SF community "hangs out" at Lake/Chicago, and has ever since Uncle Hugo's moved their from their old place at 4th and Franklin.

If they're there at 11pm, they're idiots or criminals.
Learning Firearms - Training and Firearms Industry Video Production
http://www.learningfirearms.com
User avatar
UnaStamus
 
Posts: 882 [View]
Joined: Fri Jan 28, 2011 2:33 am

Re: My response to "Community Impact Statement"

Postby 20mm on Thu Dec 18, 2014 9:10 am

Chicago Lake Liquors is behind the laundry mat for those who didn't know.

Image
Image
Image
"Go 20mm" - Sigfan220
""Real men shoot 20mm." - FJ540
"If I could be reincarnated as a fabric, I would come back as a 38 double-D bra." - Jesse Ventura
20mm
 
Posts: 835 [View]
Joined: Fri Jul 06, 2012 12:34 pm

Re: My response to "Community Impact Statement"

Postby SparkyJeff on Thu Dec 18, 2014 7:05 pm

UnaStamus wrote:If they're there at 11pm, they're idiots or criminals.

Or maybe they have clothes to wash.
A fight for liberty somewhere, is a fight for liberty everywhere.
User avatar
SparkyJeff
 
Posts: 1621 [View]
Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 8:59 pm

Re: My response to "Community Impact Statement"

Postby SpiderPig on Tue Jan 06, 2015 9:32 pm

UnaStamus wrote:Lake St. and Chicago Ave S is 3rd Precinct, and is a high crime area for robberies, prostitution and heroin and crack dealing. It's also claimed by the 10's Bloods, but disputed by the Rolling 20's. Laundromats at late hours are where people do their drug business because it's easy to hide/ditch dope, and there's always an excuse to be there at any hour. Much easier than explaining why you're standing at the corner of an intersection at 1am and have been for the past two hours. It's also easier to defend yourself from an attack or drug robbery.

There's always a back story. This is not to mention the fact that someone buying a gun like that is illegal, and more often than not, the gun was obtained illegally from someone else; be it stolen or a straw purchase. Our goal as gun owners should be to advocate for harsher penalties for gun crimes, and it has been a platform that the NRA has been vocally supportive of. The whole "enforce the laws already on the books, don't make new ones" thing. This is one of those times when the laws on the books are being enforced.

If anyone is advocating for someone who routinely hangs out at Lake/Chicago for anything other than employment reasons to be able to carry a gun, they must not be spending much time there after hours.


I think I disagree. It's not illegal to purchase a gun from a guy on the street. It's also not illegal to be wherever the hell I want to be at 1am. I also don't believe we should have harsher penalties for gun crimes. I believe in harsher penalties for murder, robbery, burglary etc. But a "gun crime"? Like having the zipper open on your gun case? Too much gray area there for me.

The guy's record may show him to be an idiot but even idiots have rights to defend themselves.
User avatar
SpiderPig
 
Posts: 121 [View]
Joined: Thu Jan 29, 2009 10:21 pm

Re: My response to "Community Impact Statement"

Postby UnaStamus on Wed Jan 07, 2015 7:43 pm

SpiderPig wrote:
I think I disagree. It's not illegal to purchase a gun from a guy on the street. It's also not illegal to be wherever the hell I want to be at 1am. I also don't believe we should have harsher penalties for gun crimes. I believe in harsher penalties for murder, robbery, burglary etc. But a "gun crime"? Like having the zipper open on your gun case? Too much gray area there for me.

The guy's record may show him to be an idiot but even idiots have rights to defend themselves.

"Gun crime" refers to violent (robbery, murder, assault, etc) crimes and property crimes (1st deg burglary, illegal/straw purchases and sales for drug cartels or gangs, etc) that were committed with the use or threatened use of the gun. The term "gun crimes" as it has been used by the NRA and other organizations has never been meant to refer to minor issues like a broken gun case zipper, which by the way is a DNR crime and not even relevant to the issue because it's never been part of any proposal for enhanced enforcement.

I don't think you understand what buying a gun "from a guy on the street" means. This is understandable if you haven't lived in the really ghetto rathole areas of the Minneapolis like you find in 3rd and 4th precincts. What people here don't understand is the way that things work in the Chicago/Lake area of the city. Most people passing through or who are there for short periods don't know a whole lot about the culture or level of crime that occurs there. The issue here is that you have a lack of understanding of context in which the gun was purchased, because you're likely basing it off of a different perpective. Buying guns "off the street" in Minneapolis means that you are purchasing a gun with no regard to the legality of said gun. You don't care about whether either party is lawfully allowed to own a gun, and you are buying the gun with no regard as to whether the gun was stolen or not. More often than not, guns sales on "the street" in Minneapolis are done with reasonable grounds for one or both parties to know that the buyer or seller is ineligible and the gun is probably stolen or been recently used in a crime and the "owner" is trying to dump it so as not to be caught with it or tied to it.
Learning Firearms - Training and Firearms Industry Video Production
http://www.learningfirearms.com
User avatar
UnaStamus
 
Posts: 882 [View]
Joined: Fri Jan 28, 2011 2:33 am

Re: My response to "Community Impact Statement"

Postby MaryB on Wed Jan 07, 2015 8:43 pm

2 areas of MPLS I avoid like the plague when I have to be up there. One of my nieces wanted to go to some club there until I showed her the crime reports. Club wasn't my idea of fun either, my hearing is bad enough already without cranked to the max whatever they call it non-music these days. Told I would buy supper if we went somewhere a little more classy. Ended up at Lion's Tap, okay not so classy but better area and food is decent. Her choice!
MaryB
 
Posts: 454 [View]
Joined: Mon Feb 25, 2013 1:56 am

Re: My response to "Community Impact Statement"

Postby xd ED on Wed Jan 07, 2015 9:30 pm

Chicago Av S around Lake St was a sewer 10 years ago when I had to work in that area. I cannot believe it's improved since then.
I got trapped in an apartment bldg when a fight broke out in a basement unit. No cell phone; after a bit MPLS's finest arrived and got things calmed down. There's all the houses with no furniture in the living rooms because the kids have to stay below the level of the windows after a kid got shot while doing her homework.

And then there's Powderhorn Park, which looks like Currier and Ives winter scene, where a woman was molested in front of her kids.

But heck, the city's got light rail and lots of green rooftop gardens.
LET'S GO BRANDON
User avatar
xd ED
 
Posts: 9025 [View]
Joined: Fri Jun 18, 2010 6:28 pm
Location: Saint Paul

Previous

Return to General Gun Chat

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 15 guests

cron