mmcnx2 wrote:Ghost wrote:mmcnx2 wrote:or telling you how to use and AR15 for home defense.
Is there a downside to this?
Over penetration, or miss. That round is going on to the next thing, which might be a good long distance way and something you did not see in the flight path. Also not very easy to handle in close quarters, requiring 2 hands to run effectively. Time on target in most cases is slower and ability to stop an advance at 20 feet and under with a single round is less than with many other options.
In terms of practicality and effectiveness in most cases a pistol (large and expanding bullets) is preferred, then very short barreled shotgun(buck shot) , last a rifle.
Folk are watching way to many movies if they really think an AR is the best tool for close work with uncertain backstops.
Lastly, you are most likely going to court if you use it. Totally bias on the side of juries, but I'd rather defend the use of a pistol over and AR for protection any day.
http://www.guns.com/2015/09/17/self-defense-inside-the-home-avoiding-over-penetratio/
Despite the popularity of the round, too few realize that 9mm ball ammo can easily punch through not just one but several interior walls. By contrast, .223 rifle ammunition tends to tumble, turn and slow down when penetrating barriers, even more than a 9mm fired from some pistols. Many shooters like to debate this point, and admittedly on the surface it doesn’t seem logical, but studies done by SWAT teams over a decade ago revealed this phenomenon to be fact and it was one of the main reasons a lot of tactical teams transitioned to M-4s/AR-15s and gave up the H&K MP-5 SMG in the 80s and 90s.