To be fair, the douchnozzles out west are going to ruin shooting on BLM land too.
I just don't understand what's so hard about cleaning up after yourself...
BigBlue wrote:I just don't understand the mindset of many people these days. How can you not clean up after yourself? Obviously the folks littering have never had to fight for preservation of any type of rights or access before. I have a lot of years trying to keep snowmobile trails open in a near-metro area and I know many of the same types of challenges. People also abuse that type of stuff.
I think this same littering is also rampant with ice fishing people. Hearing a lot about all the crap left on the ice lately. Beyond stupid.
And Sam, jump back under the bridge and cut this guy some slack. Not everyone who wants a little flexibility in target shooting is an unsafe jerk.
BB
Seismic Sam wrote:90% likely that somebody making initial comments about being "forced" to join a range and/or "not getting the hairy eyeball from an RO" is a douchnozzle and NOT responsible shooter.
Seismic Sam wrote: You point is noted and well taken, but as far as what the Las Vegas oddsmakers would say, it's 90% likely that somebody making initial comments about being "forced" to join a range and/or "not getting the hairy eyeball from an RO" is a douchnozzle and NOT responsible shooter.
Ivan45 wrote:Any state forest is legal. Chengwatana is a popular spot.
Sent from my HTC One_M8 using Tapatalk
MJY65 wrote:Seismic Sam wrote: You point is noted and well taken, but as far as what the Las Vegas oddsmakers would say, it's 90% likely that somebody making initial comments about being "forced" to join a range and/or "not getting the hairy eyeball from an RO" is a douchnozzle and NOT responsible shooter.
Some shooters AND some ROs are douche nozzles. Perhaps a special range can be formed for them to hang out with each other so the ROs will have real policing to do and the shooters will have someone to chase them away.
It seems like most ranges start out with a reasonable set of safety rules. Each year, or each new president adds just a few due to some real, perceived or potential problem. Soon you have the 4 rules turn into 40. "No glass targets" becomes "Paper targets only" and the shooting range version of zero tolerance is in play.
BigDog58 wrote:If you are willing to pay a reasonable membership fee and be able to basically shoot and be left alone, check out Rainbow Sportsmen's Club. It's just North of Cokato. $60 a year or $170 for 3 yrs.
MJY65 wrote:Some shooters AND some ROs are douche nozzles. Perhaps a special range can be formed for them to hang out with each other so the ROs will have real policing to do and the shooters will have someone to chase them away.
It seems like most ranges start out with a reasonable set of safety rules. Each year, or each new president adds just a few due to some real, perceived or potential problem. Soon you have the 4 rules turn into 40. "No glass targets" becomes "Paper targets only" and the shooting range version of zero tolerance is in play.
FJ540 wrote:It might just be winter, but H&H invited me out to Oakdale Saturday and there were at least a dozen people there while we were there, but there were no issues of any kind. We had 4 shooters on the 100yd range, 3 on the 50, and there was a group of 6 using the manual pigeon chucker before we arrived over there. They finished up, and we used it until end of hours. Whole afternoon was spent there, and it was FUN!
That's the busiest the place has ever been in my experience, outside of coordinated MNGT events.
I shot at water filled bottles. No one took issue with it. We've had various steel targets there in the past as well (mine, David's, maybe others too but I don't recall them).
It's a nice club. I've been on the fence about joining lately. The waiting list issue was part of it in the past, but H&H also mentioned that there's enough turnover that it's not so bad now with 1600 memberships when it used to be 800 and those core people stuck around.
Zombinie wrote:BigDog58 wrote:If you are willing to pay a reasonable membership fee and be able to basically shoot and be left alone, check out Rainbow Sportsmen's Club. It's just North of Cokato. $60 a year or $170 for 3 yrs.
Just checked them out it sounds great, I will definitely join at that price, however they seem to have not updated the membership forms for 2017
Seismic Sam wrote:BigBlue wrote:I just don't understand the mindset of many people these days. How can you not clean up after yourself? Obviously the folks littering have never had to fight for preservation of any type of rights or access before. I have a lot of years trying to keep snowmobile trails open in a near-metro area and I know many of the same types of challenges. People also abuse that type of stuff.
I think this same littering is also rampant with ice fishing people. Hearing a lot about all the crap left on the ice lately. Beyond stupid.
And Sam, jump back under the bridge and cut this guy some slack. Not everyone who wants a little flexibility in target shooting is an unsafe jerk.
BB
You point is noted and well taken, but as far as what the Las Vegas oddsmakers would say, it's 90% likely that somebody making initial comments about being "forced" to join a range and/or "not getting the hairy eyeball from an RO" is a douchnozzle and NOT responsible shooter.
Rip Van Winkle wrote: Those thick rulebooks you guys hate, every rule in them was necessary because some asshat didn't have the sense God gave lettuce.
MJY65 wrote:Rip Van Winkle wrote: Those thick rulebooks you guys hate, every rule in them was necessary because some asshat didn't have the sense God gave lettuce.
Really? What aspect of safety or common sense is violated by allowing members to shoot at self healing rubber gongs up off the ground on target frames? They are no more likely to cause a ricochet than paper, yet they are not allowed. Why? Easier to just say "paper only" than use some discretion. No different than the zero tolerance rules that get a kid suspended from school for a plastic butter knife in their lunch.
How about the unwritten rules some ROs like to make up? A friend and I went to shoot at a range where I had a membership (guests are allowed). I signed us both into the book on separate lines. RO must have felt the need to bitch that day and came over to us.
RO:"You guys both need to sign in"
ME: "We did"
RO: "No, you each have to write your own name in the book"
WTF? That rule does not exist anywhere. He made it up. I could have told him to get lost, but I ignored him and went on with my day. The point is: I'm a paying member with no safety violations or complaints against me. I go there for some relaxation. I don't really care to be on the defensive about such trivia. THAT is the kind of thing that sours a lot of us on certain ranges and ROs.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 18 guests