Scratch wrote:I'm interested in hearing more about Franklin Armorys Providence. The non semi auto AR:
I could only understand about every third word spoken, but this appears to be the answer to a question no one would ever ask.
Scratch wrote:I'm interested in hearing more about Franklin Armorys Providence. The non semi auto AR:
Holland&Holland wrote:Rowdy Roddy wrote:Winchester's new .350 legend
If it runs good, I may have just found my next AR build.
Me too
xd ED wrote:Scratch wrote:I'm interested in hearing more about Franklin Armorys Providence. The non semi auto AR:
I could only understand about every third word spoken, but this appears to be the answer to a question no one would ever ask.
Holland&Holland wrote:Maybe a hedge for if semi autos get banned?
Holland&Holland wrote:Maybe a hedge for if semi autos get banned?
https://www.ammoland.com/2019/01/how-the-providence-non-semi-automatic-pistol-works-shot-show-2019/#ixzz5eHruaDSa
....The firearm was said to utilize a digital action, and to fire one round with each pull of the trigger.....
The firing sequence is this.
The firearm starts with an empty chamber or a fired case in the chamber.
Pulling the trigger unlocks the bolt, retracts the bolt and bolt carrier, and ejects the fired case if there is one.
The trigger continues to retract the bolt carrier and the bolt, until the trigger releases both.
Then the bolt and bolt carrier move forward, stripping a round from the magazine and chambering it.
The bolt carrier continues forward, rotating and locking the bolt.
There is a fixed firing pin on the bolt carrier. The bolt carrier continues forward. The firing pin on the bolt carrier impacts the primer, firing the chambered round. The fired case stays in the chamber, locked in by the bolt.
The sequence begins again with another pull of the trigger.
An advantage of the system, firing from a locked bolt, would be to take full advantage of a suppressor. There is no gas leakage to the rear of the fired case. No gas or powder fouling is introduced into the action.
xd ED wrote:Holland&Holland wrote:Maybe a hedge for if semi autos get banned?
Reading up a little on this:https://www.ammoland.com/2019/01/how-the-providence-non-semi-automatic-pistol-works-shot-show-2019/#ixzz5eHruaDSa
....The firearm was said to utilize a digital action, and to fire one round with each pull of the trigger.....
This is the essential definition of a semi-automatic actionThe firing sequence is this.
The firearm starts with an empty chamber or a fired case in the chamber.
Pulling the trigger unlocks the bolt, retracts the bolt and bolt carrier, and ejects the fired case if there is one.
The trigger continues to retract the bolt carrier and the bolt, until the trigger releases both.
Then the bolt and bolt carrier move forward, stripping a round from the magazine and chambering it.
The bolt carrier continues forward, rotating and locking the bolt.
There is a fixed firing pin on the bolt carrier. The bolt carrier continues forward. The firing pin on the bolt carrier impacts the primer, firing the chambered round. The fired case stays in the chamber, locked in by the bolt.
The sequence begins again with another pull of the trigger.
An advantage of the system, firing from a locked bolt, would be to take full advantage of a suppressor. There is no gas leakage to the rear of the fired case. No gas or powder fouling is introduced into the action.
Since there is no mention of any stored energy (spring) released when the trigger is pressed, one has to assume an extremely heavy (and/ or very long) trigger to manipulate the action's sequence.
As far as getting around the ATF, if they can call a rifle stock a machine-gun, this thing might well become a nuclear weapon.
Rip Van Winkle wrote:Holland&Holland wrote:Maybe a hedge for if semi autos get banned?
It will take about 5 seconds for the anti's to add this to their list.
In fact, I would wager that legally speaking, with the action being manipulated via trigger pull, this would be considered a semi-auto.
Rowdy Roddy wrote:By that reasoning, a revolver could be considered semi-auto, no?
Rowdy Roddy wrote:Rip Van Winkle wrote:It will take about 5 seconds for the anti's to add this to their list.
In fact, I would wager that legally speaking, with the action being manipulated via trigger pull, this would be considered a semi-auto.
By that reasoning, a revolver could be considered semi-auto, no?
Ghost wrote:Rowdy Roddy wrote:Rip Van Winkle wrote:It will take about 5 seconds for the anti's to add this to their list.
In fact, I would wager that legally speaking, with the action being manipulated via trigger pull, this would be considered a semi-auto.
By that reasoning, a revolver could be considered semi-auto, no?
Isn’t it? (Double action)
Holland&Holland wrote:
Is a double barrel shotgun a semi-auto then?
xd ED wrote:Holland&Holland wrote:
Is a double barrel shotgun a semi-auto then?
I think 'self-loading' needs to occur.
Plus being scary in appearance is implicit.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 18 guests