CNC_Guy wrote:I'm also not seeing much recourse for someone wrongly accused, a person falsely calling Red Flag should be up for a felony.
So you'd think.
CNC_Guy wrote:I'm also not seeing much recourse for someone wrongly accused, a person falsely calling Red Flag should be up for a felony.
The anti's goal is for the fewest possible number of people to have guns. Since more blatant bans risk being declared unconstitutional, this is their next tactic.xd ED wrote:Like any gun control measure I've heard of, the emphasis is on control.
Safety and welfare are at best secondary.
Lumpy wrote:The anti's goal is for the fewest possible number of people to have guns. Since more blatant bans risk being declared unconstitutional, this is their next tactic.xd ED wrote:Like any gun control measure I've heard of, the emphasis is on control.
Safety and welfare are at best secondary.
raggers wrote:That's a brilliant analysis.
It so often helps when you spell out what would be involved if a dumb idea is put into law.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 8 guests