MNGunTalk.com

Can Minnesota learn from other's mistakes? The following article tells about how California allocated $24 million to go get 20,000 guns from folk that shouldn't have them. Now, six years later, the money is gone and about 9,000 of the guns are still out there. How much better would we do in MN?
The article is here:
https://www.thetruthaboutguns.com/2019/ ... s-to-grow/

What a complete waste.

$2182 dollars per gun received.

If they offered a "buy-back" with $2182 per gun, they might get a few more "sheeple" to turn in their guns.

Not that I could after losing all my STUFF in the StCroix river in a boating accident.

OldmanFCSA wrote:$2182 dollars per gun received.

If they offered a "buy-back" with $2182 per gun, they might get a few more "sheeple" to turn in their guns.

Not that I could after losing all my STUFF in the StCroix river in a boating accident.

At $2182 per gun I could buy, er I mean have, a lot of guns to turn in

Holland&Holland wrote:At $2182 per gun I could buy, er I mean have, a lot of guns to turn in

And Hi Points suddenly become best sellers!

Ironbear wrote:

Holland&Holland wrote:At $2182 per gun I could buy, er I mean have, a lot of guns to turn in

And Hi Points suddenly become best sellers!

I was thinking red ryders at $29.99 each!

Holland&Holland wrote:

Ironbear wrote:

Holland&Holland wrote:At $2182 per gun I could buy, er I mean have, a lot of guns to turn in

And Hi Points suddenly become best sellers!

I was thinking red ryders at $29.99 each!

That's some serious fire power now.

Ghost wrote:

Holland&Holland wrote:
I was thinking red ryders at $29.99 each!

That's some serious fire power now.

Enough to get you arrested for discharge of a firearm in many municipalities.

........and put your eye out!

hammAR wrote:........and put your eye out!

Of course!