Kim Potter, ex-Minnesota officer, found guilty of manslaught

Gun related chat that doesn't fit in another forum

Kim Potter, ex-Minnesota officer, found guilty of manslaught

Postby Stugotz on Thu Dec 23, 2021 1:47 pm

A Minneapolis jury on Thursday convicted former police officer Kim Potter on all charges she faced for fatally shooting Black motorist Daunte Wright earlier this year.

The Hennepin County panel found Potter guilty of first-degree manslaughter, meaning she improperly used “such force and violence that death of or great bodily harm to any person was reasonably foreseeable.”

Jurors also found the white former officer guilty of second-degree manslaughter charge, which only required a finding of “culpable negligence” that created “unreasonable risk, and consciously takes chances of causing death or great bodily harm to another.”

ONCE AGAIN THE COURTS/JURY COWED TO THE LIBERAL LEFT... :roll:
Last edited by Stugotz on Thu Dec 23, 2021 3:54 pm, edited 2 times in total.
Speed is Fine, Accuracy is final....but accurate hits at extremely high speed is final much faster.
I don't think you understand, these boys killed my dog!
Taking the gun off safe increases the velocity by 100%
User avatar
Stugotz
 
Posts: 295 [View]
Joined: Sun Apr 07, 2013 10:22 am
Location: Twin Cities

Re: Kim Potter, ex-Minnesota officer, found guilty of manslaught

Postby yukonjasper on Thu Dec 23, 2021 1:50 pm

The MOB wins again.
Deo Adjuvante Non Timendum - (with the help of God there is nothing to be afraid of)
Spectamur Agendo - (We are proven by our actions)
Non Ducor, Duco - (I am not led, I lead)
NRA Life Member
User avatar
yukonjasper
 
Posts: 5823 [View]
Joined: Wed Feb 06, 2008 3:31 pm
Location: eagan

Re: Kim Potter, ex-Minnesota officer, found guilty of manslaught

Postby crbutler on Thu Dec 23, 2021 2:34 pm

Depends on jury instructions.

I’m no lawyer but when the judge stated that they needed to consider other jurors beliefs in their deliberations, I would think it made a hole you can drive a ship through to appeal.

On the face of it though- if you shoot someone, it is reasonable to expect great bodily harm. By announcing Taser she demonstrated she didn’t feel he needed deadly force at that point.

If you are a cop, is it professional negligence to not train to the point that you automatically grab what piece of kit you intend to or need?

I don’t have an issue with finding her guilty of something, but do dislike the laundry list charging of folks. From my uninvolved state, I’m not buying 1st degree AND second degree convictions for the same event. Sounds suspiciously like double jeopardy.
crbutler
 
Posts: 1659 [View]
Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2011 8:29 pm

Re: Kim Potter, ex-Minnesota officer, found guilty of manslaught

Postby Bearcatrp on Thu Dec 23, 2021 3:08 pm

What a crock of crapola. There will be an appeal!
Bearcatrp
 
Posts: 2979 [View]
Joined: Sun Mar 16, 2014 7:57 pm

Re: Kim Potter, ex-Minnesota officer, found guilty of manslaught

Postby smurfman on Thu Dec 23, 2021 5:53 pm

It's been a long time since my Minnesota statutes class but as I recall two charges stem from different actions.

Man 2 is due to culpable negligence where it is believed the actions were without reasonable caution. I believe that not verifying she was utilizing her pistol rather than the Taser she intended is what brought this charge.

Man 1 was brought up as a charge as one of the charging subsets is someone dying in the commission of a misdemeanor or gross misdemeanor. In this case, I believe the use of a Taser, the intended tool, would have been contrary to policy and/or training which would have meant she had committed an unauthorized use of force which would then open her up to criminal prosecution.

Though this was a single event, there were multiple facets of law involved. I am also conflicted as to these charges being the most applicable but I can't think of something more appropriate. Access to witness interviews would probably have shed additional light on the matter. Better or actual follow up questions during some of the testimony may have also helped.
smurfman
 
Posts: 975 [View]
Joined: Sat Jun 12, 2010 1:43 pm

Re: Kim Potter, ex-Minnesota officer, found guilty of manslaught

Postby Stugotz on Thu Dec 23, 2021 7:59 pm

Should have NEVER been tried as a criminal case, Civil court case, yes but not criminal... :roll:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9ZUW-BBPGM0
Speed is Fine, Accuracy is final....but accurate hits at extremely high speed is final much faster.
I don't think you understand, these boys killed my dog!
Taking the gun off safe increases the velocity by 100%
User avatar
Stugotz
 
Posts: 295 [View]
Joined: Sun Apr 07, 2013 10:22 am
Location: Twin Cities

Re: Kim Potter, ex-Minnesota officer, found guilty of manslaught

Postby Lumpy on Thu Dec 23, 2021 9:38 pm

After it becomes impossible for professional police to operate, we'll get to practice libertarian self-protection. Maybe the first step in the discrediting/dismantlement of the state.
User avatar
Lumpy
 
Posts: 2733 [View]
Joined: Sat Dec 28, 2013 2:54 pm
Location: North of Lowry, West of Penn

Re: Kim Potter, ex-Minnesota officer, found guilty of manslaught

Postby Holland&Holland on Thu Dec 23, 2021 11:02 pm

You reap what you sow. I think our society will learn that lesson the hard way.
User avatar
Holland&Holland
 
Posts: 12522 [View]
Joined: Mon Jan 12, 2009 9:17 am

Re: Kim Potter, ex-Minnesota officer, found guilty of manslaught

Postby daleamn on Mon Jan 10, 2022 2:50 pm

Under the heading of adding insult to injury Judge Regina Chu ruled Kim Potter had to remain in jail over Christmas but allowed another criminal with a lengthy rap sheet released to attend a family funeral. The criminal released for the funeral never returned to jail. Just disgusting. Here's a link to the story.
https://alphanews.org/criminal-released ... n-to-jail/
Here's some quotes from the story I thought illustrated the hypocrisy.
Potter’s attorneys argued that she [Potter] shouldn’t be incarcerated pending sentencing because “she’s not a danger to the public whatsoever.”

“It is the Christmas holiday season and she is a devoted Catholic, no less, and there is no point to incarcerate her at this point in time,” one of Potter’s attorneys said. “This is a rather unique case of someone who has law enforcement experience and was never in trouble in all her life.”

Chu disagreed, forcing Potter to spend Christmas in jail.

“I am going to require that she be taken into custody and held without bail,” said Chu. “I cannot treat this case differently than any other case.”
daleamn
 
Posts: 469 [View]
Joined: Fri Feb 08, 2019 2:10 pm
Location: Twin Cities

Re: Kim Potter, ex-Minnesota officer, found guilty of manslaught

Postby Holland&Holland on Mon Jan 10, 2022 5:36 pm

Not Surprised.
User avatar
Holland&Holland
 
Posts: 12522 [View]
Joined: Mon Jan 12, 2009 9:17 am


Return to General Gun Chat

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 12 guests

cron