The irony for me here is that the blog has a line saying that nothing in the blog is legal advice, and that legal advice must be paid for: The article infers that in this case Mr. Gross should let it go "on the cuff" because of a deep and loyal friendship.

It seems to me that someone here wants to have his cake, eat it, and have a significant portion of everyone else's.
Gee, I wonder who put that bail money on their credit card …
