New update on StarTribune.com says she pulled a gun on the officer.
http://www.startribune.com/local/west/130435563.html
Paul wrote:Holland&Holland wrote:Kare 11 is reporting she was 58 and people are wondering.
What does her age have anything to do with it?
After Zarrett tried to pull her over, Gordon stopped her white Honda Civic next to the interstate median near the Hopkins Crossroad overpass. The source said that she immediately got out of her car and raised a small handgun in the direction of the officer, who was behind her car. Zarrett fired at her after seeing the gun, the source said.
The officer was the subject of a lawsuit stemming from a 2005 incident in which he fired a stun gun at a woman as she sat in the passenger seat of a vehicle. The woman later sued the Golden Valley Police Department and the case was settled for $250,000. Zarrett testified that he used the Taser for two to three seconds after the woman refused to hang up her phone during a traffic stop.
farmerj wrote:The officer (Zarrett) was the subject of a lawsuit stemming from a 2005 incident in which he fired a stun gun at a woman as she sat in the passenger seat of a vehicle. The woman later sued the Golden Valley Police Department and the case was settled for $250,000. Zarrett testified that he used the Taser for two to three seconds after the woman refused to hang up her phone during a traffic stop.
jgalt wrote:WTF?!?! How in the hell is it possible for this jbt to still be employed after admitting to this behavior?
Paul wrote:Holland&Holland wrote:Kare 11 is reporting she was 58 and people are wondering.
What does her age have anything to do with it?
The latest article does say she had a history of mental illness and was released from a psychiatric hospital not long before this occurred.
ijosef wrote:Paul wrote:Holland&Holland wrote:Kare 11 is reporting she was 58 and people are wondering.
What does her age have anything to do with it?
Age is the largest deterrent to crime - people are far less likely to commit crimes the older they get. That doesn't mean it doesn't happen (it obviously does), but it would be much more likely for a younger person to be involved in such an incident than a woman pushing 60.
The latest article does say she had a history of mental illness and was released from a psychiatric hospital not long before this occurred.
As others have said, I doubt we'll ever know what really happened. I wonder what the story would be like if someone was filming the whole thing with their cell phone or video camera.
Paul wrote:The clinic? How are the two connected?
Paul wrote:Age doesn't deter crime. Being old isn't a risk or penalty. Older people may be less likely to continue committing crimes, for a number of reasons, life experience, maturity, financial stability, but not because they are old.
My only reason for asking was to make sure that nobody was suggesting that this woman was incapable of a threatening act because she was in her 50's or that the officer shouldn't have used deadly force, if justified, because of her age.
The age of an adult shouldn't factor into the decision to use deadly force when they are wielding a firearm.
Paul wrote:Yes... Older people are statistically less likely to CONTINUE committing crimes. But women are less likely than men to commit violent crimes. Is being female a crime deterrent? What if Asian races were less likely to commit crimes than Hispanic races. Does that mean with all other factors being equal that being Asian is a deterrent of crime?
A deterrent is the penalty of the act, risk of being caught, jail sentence, death sentence, security cameras, presence of police/security and whatever else. Something that a third party can do that would influence your decision. Not simply getting old. You can't control that as a crime fighting tool.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 19 guests