Squib Joe wrote:And the dead guy? I'm sure he was just turning his life around but...]
Oh I see. You're saying he deserved to die.
Squib Joe wrote:And the dead guy? I'm sure he was just turning his life around but...]
Squib Joe wrote:I'd like to know more about the accomplice. Because there was a death, if she was involved in the crime in any way she should at the very least be charged with manslaughter as an accessory.
Heffay wrote:Squib Joe wrote:And the dead guy? I'm sure he was just turning his life around but...]
Oh I see. You're saying he deserved to die.
Squib Joe wrote:Heffay wrote:Squib Joe wrote:And the dead guy? I'm sure he was just turning his life around but...]
Oh I see. You're saying he deserved to die.
Is that what I said? Because I don't remember that.
I will say that if you spend your time pistol-whipping folks to get their grocery money, you should fully expect that you might get killed while doing it.
Rip Van Winkle wrote:if the facts remain as they appear to be now, and you were sitting on the jury for this this man's murder trial, would you vote to convict?
tazdevil wrote:As I read through this I remember a question I posted on here a little while back about the permits and if we should follow Utah's example and add our photo's to them. I also remember the "pistol whipping" I received on here asking that very question and people attributing it to the same thing as having a "conceal/carry badge" (which could be determined as impersonating a Police Officer, not something I'd ever suggest doing). Yet here, if the original news article is quoting the carry holder's OWN WORDS correctly, that's exactly what happened. IN HIS OWN WORDS, he stated that the mugger fled when he showed up, and he gave chase......Now here's where I have the problem: He gave chase, but did he check on the victim first to see if she needed any immediate help? She was pistol whipped (potential head injury-very serious situation needing immediate medical attention). Plus in giving chase, is he no longer acting as joe public and now acting as Law enforcement?
In addition, here's a second scenario that could've developed (and may now that gang bangers know permit holders will defend themselves violently if necessary-which I completely believe in to defend self/family). He gives chase, goes around a corner into a alley following, and Mr. Mugger has his hoodlum gang waiting around the corner with all their weapons drawn. Put yourself in that situation, only the Terminator or Chuck Norris are going to be walking back out of that alley corner on their own 2 feet (unless the permit holder had a grenade, but then he/she would have many other problems).
tazdevil wrote:http://www.mnguntalk.com/viewtopic.php?f=20&t=19172
I thought it would give the card more security to have our faces on it, not for purposes of a "badge" as that threads direction took.
westhope wrote:The only reason to show ones Permit to Carry is to a Police Officer when requested.
tazdevil wrote:As I read through this I remember a question I posted on here a little while back about the permits and if we should follow Utah's example and add our photo's to them. I also remember the "pistol whipping" I received on here asking that very question and people attributing it to the same thing as having a "conceal/carry badge" (which could be determined as impersonating a Police Officer, not something I'd ever suggest doing). Yet here, if the original news article is quoting the carry holder's OWN WORDS correctly, that's exactly what happened. IN HIS OWN WORDS, he stated that the mugger fled when he showed up, and he gave chase......Now here's where I have the problem: He gave chase, but did he check on the victim first to see if she needed any immediate help? She was pistol whipped (potential head injury-very serious situation needing immediate medical attention). Plus in giving chase, is he no longer acting as joe public and now acting as Law enforcement?
In addition, here's a second scenario that could've developed (and may now that gang bangers know permit holders will defend themselves violently if necessary-which I completely believe in to defend self/family). He gives chase, goes around a corner into a alley following, and Mr. Mugger has his hoodlum gang waiting around the corner with all their weapons drawn. Put yourself in that situation, only the Terminator or Chuck Norris are going to be walking back out of that alley corner on their own 2 feet (unless the permit holder had a grenade, but then he/she would have many other problems).
tazdevil wrote:Why should I do that Pinnacle, I thought we were on here to debate such things, not get uptight about them when someone doesn't see things your way.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 6 guests