Wisconsin Police Officer Shoots Self In Foot

Discussion of firearm-related news stories. Please use "Off Topic" for non-firearm news.
Forum rules
Do NOT post the full text of published articles. If you would like to discuss a news story please link to it and, at most, include a brief summary of the article.

Re: Wisconsin Police Officer Shoots Self In Foot

Postby nyffman on Mon Oct 31, 2011 11:04 am

farmerj wrote:
I was able to finally get the CO and 1SG to agree to have the unit walking around with a blank in the chamber unless they were in the chow hall or the front office. Otherwise it was like they were outside the wire. Loaded round in the chamber.



So, just a question. I assume the purpose of the blank was to identify anyone screwing around with trigger discipline. Can I also assume that a blank would not cycle the action? Thus, in a case where the real rounds were needed, he would need to have the presence of mind to manually eject the first round, either before or after firing the blank, right?
our quarrel is not about the value of freedom per se, but stems from our opinion of our fellow men … a man’s admiration of absolute government is proportionate to the contempt he feels for those around him --Alexis de Tocqueville--
User avatar
nyffman
 
Posts: 5176 [View]
Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 9:46 am

Re: Wisconsin Police Officer Shoots Self In Foot

Postby tman on Mon Oct 31, 2011 11:23 am

nyffman wrote:So, just a question. I assume the purpose of the blank was to identify anyone screwing around with trigger discipline. Can I also assume that a blank would not cycle the action? Thus, in a case where the real rounds were needed, he would need to have the presence of mind to manually eject the first round, either before or after firing the blank, right?



Not a lot of tangos in ND, nyffman. It sounds like it was an excellent training exercise, where only ONE round was needed.
Badged Thug & MN Permit to Carry Instructor
Slowly growing 1911 Glock collection. Donations accepted
User avatar
tman
 
Posts: 2981 [View]
Joined: Sat Sep 29, 2007 9:25 pm
Location: Centrally isolated in Northern MN

Re: Wisconsin Police Officer Shoots Self In Foot

Postby farmerj on Mon Oct 31, 2011 12:05 pm

nyffman wrote:
farmerj wrote:
I was able to finally get the CO and 1SG to agree to have the unit walking around with a blank in the chamber unless they were in the chow hall or the front office. Otherwise it was like they were outside the wire. Loaded round in the chamber.



So, just a question. I assume the purpose of the blank was to identify anyone screwing around with trigger discipline. Can I also assume that a blank would not cycle the action? Thus, in a case where the real rounds were needed, he would need to have the presence of mind to manually eject the first round, either before or after firing the blank, right?


At the armory, just a blank was used. You screwed with the trigger, everyone knew it.

At places like ripley or in the field, you had a blank adapter on and a loaded magazine as well. It would keep firing till it drove the point home.

Either way, LOTS of people got involved and excited.


I have had to deal with two ND's in the line of duty with live rounds. Thank god no one was injured in either case. After we started doing training this way, it never happened again.
We reap what we sow. In our case, we have sown our government.
Current moon phase
User avatar
farmerj
 
Posts: 4802 [View]
Joined: Fri Aug 10, 2007 9:11 am
Location: The edge of the universe in the vertex of time on the space continuum of confusion

Re: Wisconsin Police Officer Shoots Self In Foot

Postby Paul on Mon Oct 31, 2011 12:09 pm

So where is the failure or break down in the training process that this is needed? Or is it just a lack of familiarity/absence from the weapon? From the guard folks I know, it sounds like time spent training with weapons is minimal.
Paul
Moderator
 
Posts: 5879 [View]
Joined: Sun Feb 15, 2009 6:46 am

Re: Wisconsin Police Officer Shoots Self In Foot

Postby farmerj on Mon Oct 31, 2011 12:24 pm

Paul wrote:So where is the failure or break down in the training process that this is needed? Or is it just a lack of familiarity/absence from the weapon? From the guard folks I know, it sounds like time spent training with weapons is minimal.


I saw it needed for two reasons:
Lack of people understanding the simple instruction: "Keep the booger hook off the bang switch!"
Lack of weapons handling skills.

Take a college student who lived in town all his life and they just don't spend a lot of time with a gun. (most not all) People go to the range and I would see it all the time. Insert a magazine and the first thing their finger does is go to the trigger. I harped on my line safeties over this ALL the time. Both as as Safety officer and a range officer.

Now take them off the range and it became a huge safety issue. I kept seeing the same actions and reactions. Comments wouldn't do much.

Fire off a blank and everyone in the immediate area hears it. You can NOT hide that fact. Your actions suddenly become real with real reactions. A ND with a blank was handled the same as a ND with a live round.

Translate that to every day John Q. Public and the local police, you will (experience again here) see the same thing. Some folks are really good about their discipline. Others are not.

For those that get into a habit of putting the booger hook on the bang switch as they draw. You get a ND. And that's why you have an article like the OP here.

And THAT is no accident. It's negligent.
We reap what we sow. In our case, we have sown our government.
Current moon phase
User avatar
farmerj
 
Posts: 4802 [View]
Joined: Fri Aug 10, 2007 9:11 am
Location: The edge of the universe in the vertex of time on the space continuum of confusion

Previous

Return to In The News

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests

cron