tazdevil wrote:Is anyone surprised when we elect a politician from one of the most corrupt states (Illinois) that any of this is happening? Or that much worse may yet unfold? You get whats you paid for.
Did you read the article?
tazdevil wrote:Is anyone surprised when we elect a politician from one of the most corrupt states (Illinois) that any of this is happening? Or that much worse may yet unfold? You get whats you paid for.
Heffay wrote:tazdevil wrote:Is anyone surprised when we elect a politician from one of the most corrupt states (Illinois) that any of this is happening? Or that much worse may yet unfold? You get whats you paid for.
Did you read the article?
CarryCauseICan wrote:Walk could keep guns from walking so easily across the border? Hmmmm?.... How about a large fence! Wouldn't necessarily stop the problem, but could possibly slow it down significantly! But.....? Didn't some one say that a fence was nearly finished? Hmmm?
Heffay wrote:CarryCauseICan wrote:Walk could keep guns from walking so easily across the border? Hmmmm?.... How about a large fence! Wouldn't necessarily stop the problem, but could possibly slow it down significantly! But.....? Didn't some one say that a fence was nearly finished? Hmmm?
A fence? Didn't the Chinese try that with a nice big long wall?
Unless you're trying to create a tourist destination, I'm not sure what good a fence would do.
tazdevil wrote:Heffay wrote:A fence? Didn't the Chinese try that with a nice big long wall?
Unless you're trying to create a tourist destination, I'm not sure what good a fence would do.
Well, there was the Berlin wall, but that didn't end well for the Soviet Union either.
A Fortune investigation reveals that the ATF never intentionally allowed guns to fall into the hands of Mexican drug cartels. How the world came to believe just the opposite is a tale of rivalry, murder, and political bloodlust.
Heffay wrote:What a brilliant idea! The maps clearly show the border as a straight, flat line so there should be no problems with keeping all that water the area doesn't have in it!
Heffay wrote:What a brilliant idea! The maps clearly show the border as a straight, flat line so there should be no problems with keeping all that water the area doesn't have in it!
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests