Heffay wrote:Whoever came up with zero tolerance rules should have been beat soundly.
Mike Johnston pointed out there is nothing in the police officer’s report saying he told the boys they had the right to remain silent before they admitted to shooting the air guns. They also weren’t told they could have their parents with them before being questioned, Johnston said.
LarryP wrote:Guys a permit holder- Cops don't like that- Punish the kid to get back at dad.
LarryP wrote:Guys a permit holder- Cops don't like that- Punish the kid to get back at dad.
tazdevil wrote:Well it's rare that I would say something like this, but in this case, if it goes to court, sounds like he would get off on a technicality; which in this case would be a good thing. Two technicalities, actually from the article:Mike Johnston pointed out there is nothing in the police officer’s report saying he told the boys they had the right to remain silent before they admitted to shooting the air guns. They also weren’t told they could have their parents with them before being questioned, Johnston said.
Airsoft Gun appears to be in many city codes, however, I don't think you'll see enforcement unless someone complains, or it's pointed at a officer (which of course could lead to much worse than a minor fine!).
Dante wrote:
I think there may be only one technicality there as from my understanding, minors are not afforded the same rights as adults.
Am I wrong?
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 26 guests