A sigh of relief?

Discussion of firearm-related news stories. Please use "Off Topic" for non-firearm news.
Forum rules
Do NOT post the full text of published articles. If you would like to discuss a news story please link to it and, at most, include a brief summary of the article.

Re: A sigh of relief?

Postby LarryP on Mon Jan 14, 2013 12:07 am

People claimed Obama would lose the election to.




Evad wrote:http://news.yahoo.com/gun-lobby-congress-doesnt-muscle-pass-gun-control-202436760.html

On Sunday, top gun lobbyists predicted that there’s not enough support in Congress for a new ban on assault weapons and that even curbs on high-capacity magazine clips were in doubt.
LarryP
 
Posts: 1181 [View]
Joined: Mon Jan 10, 2011 3:57 pm

Re: A sigh of relief?

Postby CraigJS on Mon Jan 14, 2013 4:53 am

"You can't fix stupid".. (Ron White)
CraigJS
 
Posts: 642 [View]
Joined: Sat Aug 11, 2007 7:58 am

Re: A sigh of relief?

Postby jdege on Mon Jan 14, 2013 7:11 am

Heffay wrote:Do you think they are saying the same thing right now about us?

Perhaps. The critical difference is that we are right, and they are wrong.
User avatar
jdege
 
Posts: 4787 [View]
Joined: Sun Jul 29, 2007 10:07 am

Re: A sigh of relief?

Postby Thunder71 on Mon Jan 14, 2013 9:13 am

jdege wrote:The critical difference is that we are right, and they are wrong.

Guessing they are also saying that.

I've read quite a few of our oppositions comments lately, and tried to keep an open mind... I was looking to understand where they were coming from, and why they felt the way they did.

The problem seems to be that they don't see us as fathers, teachers, productive, hard working individuals, rather as James Yeager and Ted Nugent types who seem to go out of their way to act crazy. I don't think Yeager can complete 2 sentences without using words that are blocked from most forums. It doesn't help that those types are also hoarding their forums and Facebook pages, doing more harm than good in most cases. We don't need to bully (I hate that term, but whatever), we need to educate. They are afraid of guns for some reason, and have the perception that police and military personnel are the only ones who 'need' them, and that for some reason they are the only ones qualified to use them.

Personally, I wish folks like Mr. Colion Noir were more prominently displayed by the media.
Last edited by Thunder71 on Mon Jan 14, 2013 9:20 am, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Thunder71
 
Posts: 3096 [View]
Joined: Wed Jan 26, 2011 9:43 pm
Location: SE

Re: A sigh of relief?

Postby xd ED on Mon Jan 14, 2013 9:17 am

Thunder71 wrote:
jdege wrote:The critical difference is that we are right, and they are wrong.

Guessing they are also saying that.

They are attempting to usurp the Bill of Rights, we are not attempting to impinge on anyone's rights. We are in a defensive position, they are the aggressor.
That's something they can't say
User avatar
xd ED
 
Posts: 9228 [View]
Joined: Fri Jun 18, 2010 6:28 pm
Location: Saint Paul

Re: A sigh of relief?

Postby Thunder71 on Mon Jan 14, 2013 9:21 am

xd ED wrote:
Thunder71 wrote:
jdege wrote:The critical difference is that we are right, and they are wrong.

Guessing they are also saying that.

They are attempting to usurp the Bill of Rights, we are not attempting to impinge on anyone's rights. We are in a defensive position, they are the aggressor.
That's something they can't say

I didn't say I agreed, but if you look at THEIR posts... it's what they believe, and just as strongly.

No matter what you say, their 'second amendment' is about hunting, and even that is questionable, anything above that is just crazy - and people acting crazy are what they see (Yeager, Nugent). It's not about what right you you have, it's about the rights they think you 'need'.
User avatar
Thunder71
 
Posts: 3096 [View]
Joined: Wed Jan 26, 2011 9:43 pm
Location: SE

Re: A sigh of relief?

Postby xd ED on Mon Jan 14, 2013 9:35 am

Thunder71 wrote:
jdege wrote:The critical difference is that we are right, and they are wrong.

Guessing they are also saying that.

I've read quite a few of our oppositions comments lately, and tried to keep an open mind... I was looking to understand where they were coming from, and why they felt the way they did.

The problem seems to be that they don't see us as fathers, teachers, productive, hard working individuals, rather as James Yeager and Ted Nugent types who seem to go out of their way to act crazy. I don't think Yeager can complete 2 sentences without using words that are blocked from most forums. It doesn't help that those types are also hoarding their forums and Facebook pages, doing more harm than good in most cases. We don't need to bully (I hate that term, but whatever), we need to educate. They are afraid of guns for some reason, and have the perception that police and military personnel are the only ones who 'need' them, and that for some reason they are the only ones qualified to use them.

Personally, I wish folks like Mr. Colion Noir were more prominently displayed by the media.


Clowns like yeager merely allow the opposition convenient superficial self-gratification.
There have been many soft-spoken, thoughtful and articulate spokesmen for gun rights, and the proper use of firearms.
Their logic and rationale is unassailable.
The media ignores them, and the antis dismiss them with the same lack of reason they use to promote their tyranny.

This is an hour long. One need not watch it to learn the message. Put it on in the background and listen.

User avatar
xd ED
 
Posts: 9228 [View]
Joined: Fri Jun 18, 2010 6:28 pm
Location: Saint Paul

Re: A sigh of relief?

Postby xd ED on Mon Jan 14, 2013 9:40 am

Thunder71 wrote:
No matter what you say, their 'second amendment' is about hunting, and even that is questionable, anything above that is just crazy - and people acting crazy are what they see (Yeager, Nugent). It's not about what right you you have, it's about the rights they think you 'need'.


A combination of media complicity, a sheep mentality- ie clinging to the illusion of invulnerability, and likely strategic missteps by our side in the past, including allowing their false and irrational arguments equity with ours; i.e. accepting that they feel just as strongly, and thus begin a compromise.
User avatar
xd ED
 
Posts: 9228 [View]
Joined: Fri Jun 18, 2010 6:28 pm
Location: Saint Paul

Re: A sigh of relief?

Postby t140 on Mon Jan 14, 2013 10:09 am

First of all, you can bring JY into this all you want. The fact is that they felt the way they did prior to JY's video. His video added a tiny bit of fuel to an already hot burning stove.

Thunder71 wrote: They are afraid of guns for some reason, and have the perception that police and military personnel are the only ones who 'need' them, and that for some reason they are the only ones qualified to use them.


I have your answer - movies/tv shows.

If everyone is right in saying that the sheeple follow the TV and what it says, it's the movies and tv shows. Every day you turn on the TV to a cop(s) who obviously carries a gun hunting down some serial rapist/murderer/psychopath. You can also find a lot of shoot 'em up movies with clear good guys / bad guys. 90% of Rober De Niro's movies are like this so are a lot of Al Pacino's. Let's not even mention Jason Stathom.

Our education system is probably part of the problem, also. Everyone's told not to fight and run away and find a teacher that can help. Not to stand up and fight for what's right or how to defend yourself against physical or verbal attacks. Which I think should be taught in every public school.
t140
 
Posts: 174 [View]
Joined: Sat Nov 24, 2012 7:12 pm
Location: W Metro

Re: A sigh of relief?

Postby jdege on Mon Jan 14, 2013 10:29 am

Thunder71 wrote:
jdege wrote:The critical difference is that we are right, and they are wrong.

Guessing they are also saying that.

True. But then, when we say they are wrong, we are right, and when they say we are wrong, they are wrong.

It's all part and parcel of the same thing.
User avatar
jdege
 
Posts: 4787 [View]
Joined: Sun Jul 29, 2007 10:07 am

Re: A sigh of relief?

Postby JustPlainT on Mon Jan 14, 2013 10:30 am

Image

They may not win this time. That much is true.

But now is not the time to give up or get lax because they said they don't think they can do it. They want us to stop bombarding Congress with letters and emails and phone calls, so they can work on them and get them to vote against gun rights.

They will never give up. It may not be time to panic (and it isn't), but it is time to keep on writing to Congress. We can relax when the craziness has passed and the elevated threat is finally done and gone. And even then, we need to still be vigilant and prepared to start up the next campaign towards Washington to let them know how we feel.
Midwest Defense Institute, LLC
Quality Training at an Affordable Cost
User avatar
JustPlainT
 
Posts: 288 [View]
Joined: Mon Jul 04, 2011 7:03 pm

Re: A sigh of relief?

Postby yukonjasper on Mon Jan 14, 2013 10:41 am

you can't forget that BHO is a product of his "community organizer" past and a disciple of Sol Alinsky - author of Rules for Radicals. 5th, 8th and 13th rules ("Ridicule is man's most potent weapon", "Keep the pressure on" and "Pick the target, freeze it, personalize it, and polarize it" respectively).

They will not stop, its what they do - they will wait for the next opportunity in the form of nutcase+gun=blood in the streets and exploit it. The blood is in the water and they feel like they have an opening to jam something through while the tragedy is still in the MSM. The MSM is trying hard to keep the tragedy alive by continuing to show the images and talk about it.

The language will pop up in every bill the 2nd Amendment supporters want to pass. Parts and pieces will be passed because well meaning 2nd Amend. people will have to hold their nose to get their work done.
Deo Adjuvante Non Timendum - (with the help of God there is nothing to be afraid of)
Spectamur Agendo - (We are proven by our actions)
Non Ducor, Duco - (I am not led, I lead)
NRA Life Member
User avatar
yukonjasper
 
Posts: 5823 [View]
Joined: Wed Feb 06, 2008 3:31 pm
Location: eagan

Re: A sigh of relief?

Postby Heffay on Mon Jan 14, 2013 10:55 am

Wow, this forum is incredibly entertaining to read some days!!
To the two forum members who have used lines from my posts as their signatures, can't you quote Jesse Ventura or some other great Minnesotan instead of stealing mine? - LePetomane
User avatar
Heffay
 
Posts: 8842 [View]
Joined: Wed Jun 16, 2010 11:39 am

Re: A sigh of relief?

Postby Holland&Holland on Mon Jan 14, 2013 11:27 am

Heffay wrote:Wow, this forum is incredibly entertaining to read some days!!


Attempts at gun control by elected officials does not concern you? Enlighten us.
User avatar
Holland&Holland
 
Posts: 12661 [View]
Joined: Mon Jan 12, 2009 9:17 am

Re: A sigh of relief?

Postby Heffay on Mon Jan 14, 2013 11:33 am

Holland&Holland wrote:Attempts at gun control by elected officials does not concern you?


That's not what I find amusing.
To the two forum members who have used lines from my posts as their signatures, can't you quote Jesse Ventura or some other great Minnesotan instead of stealing mine? - LePetomane
User avatar
Heffay
 
Posts: 8842 [View]
Joined: Wed Jun 16, 2010 11:39 am

PreviousNext

Return to In The News

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 6 guests

cron