Rushed New York magazine laws fails to exempt Police

Discussion of firearm-related news stories. Please use "Off Topic" for non-firearm news.
Forum rules
Do NOT post the full text of published articles. If you would like to discuss a news story please link to it and, at most, include a brief summary of the article.

Re: Rushed New York magazine laws fails to exempt Police

Postby CraigJS on Fri Jan 18, 2013 9:01 am

Exemptions for retired cops makes some sense. They may have some BGs out there with scores to settle with the retired cop/cops. Their situation is a bit more dangerous than most at least for a while. (how ever long "a while" may be) I have NO problem with their exemption..
CraigJS
 
Posts: 642 [View]
Joined: Sat Aug 11, 2007 7:58 am

Re: Rushed New York magazine laws fails to exempt Police

Postby tman on Fri Jan 18, 2013 9:24 am

CraigJS wrote:Exemptions for retired cops makes some sense. They may have some BGs out there with scores to settle with the retired cop/cops. Their situation is a bit more dangerous than most at least for a while. (how ever long "a while" may be) I have NO problem with their exemption..



This is part of the reasoning. The other part is that we're already trained sheepdogs.
Badged Thug & MN Permit to Carry Instructor
Slowly growing 1911 Glock collection. Donations accepted
User avatar
tman
 
Posts: 2981 [View]
Joined: Sat Sep 29, 2007 9:25 pm
Location: Centrally isolated in Northern MN

Re: Rushed New York magazine laws fails to exempt Police

Postby Nat on Fri Jan 18, 2013 1:55 pm

Heffay wrote:Should also make an exemption for military vets too. :D


And, ya know... citizens.
Secrets are the opposite of Freedoms
User avatar
Nat
 
Posts: 522 [View]
Joined: Mon Jul 06, 2009 1:57 pm
Location: center metro

Previous

Return to In The News

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 9 guests

cron