farmerj wrote:
Has nothing to do with being arrogant.
It's gets real old real quick to constantly being called out for having an attitude towards cops.
My issue is not "cops" per say, but the legal system. Deal with child custody or domestic violence charges and you might begin to understand what I mean. Try having over 110 "calls for service" placed against you from an ex-wife with 90% of them claiming domestic assault in a 10 month period. Yes, they are documented.
Paul felt compelled enough to call me cop hater on that again. And it's ********. through and through and had nothing to do with this thread. I saw that as a personal attack. Call it whatever you want. It's how I felt about it. YOU cannot change that. Got a problem with it. Deal with it on your own. You have your feelings, I have mine. I will not deny mine nor will I minimize yours.
My statement, "Yop, only cops....." comes more from the comments made by the anti-gun crowd that only cops should have guns. only cops should have AR15 type firearms.
It's a stretch on Paul's part to extend that to me hating cops.
And I called him on it.
How can an EX-cop who was fired almost 5 years ago NOT have been on someones radar BEFORE today's events. Yet the gun will be the culprit.
tt3 wrote:
I've shook your hand years before out at Carry Depot and would do it again. You just gave me a chuckle, no problems here, man.
Keep on keeping on, I'll do the same.
farmerj wrote:Paul wrote:farmerj wrote:Including only cops should be armed.
As I just commented to someone of Facebook about the same thing.... That argument is getting old. It's a tired line that's been repeated over and over and over. All but one State has laws allowing citizens to legally carry a firearm, including Minnesota. Cops aren't the only ones who are armed.
Get old all you want.
After reading about NY and seeing where MN is headed.
We sure as **** will be unarmed in our life time.
mrShinola wrote:
For an anti he sure owns some heavy duty arms.
Users browsing this forum: Majestic-12 [Bot] and 14 guests