http://patriotupdate.com/2013/02/comcas ... e-network/
Don't think they have to advertise much. But still
Rip Van Winkle wrote:If Comcast doesn't want gun owners money then don't give them any.
Problem solved.
jshuberg wrote:It does demonstrate discrimination against firearms companies wanting to advertise. It's not like there are a multitude of cable companies to choose from for local advertising. I see very little difference from a store with "whites only" or "no Irish" signs of the past. Just take your business elsewhere right?
Heffay wrote:jshuberg wrote:It does demonstrate discrimination against firearms companies wanting to advertise. It's not like there are a multitude of cable companies to choose from for local advertising. I see very little difference from a store with "whites only" or "no Irish" signs of the past. Just take your business elsewhere right?
Did you just compare a business decision with Jim Crow laws?
Heffay wrote:Did you just compare a business decision with Jim Crow laws?
jshuberg wrote:Heffay wrote:Did you just compare a business decision with Jim Crow laws?
I compared a company that doesn't want to do business with firearms owners with a company that doesn't want to business with blacks. They're both engaging in discrimination.
Rip Van Winkle wrote:If Comcast doesn't want gun owners money then don't give them any.
Problem solved.
gyrfalcon wrote:Rip Van Winkle wrote:If Comcast doesn't want gun owners money then don't give them any.
Problem solved.
Except when they own a franchise that's a monopoly in your area for broadband Internet access.
Rip Van Winkle wrote:gyrfalcon wrote:Rip Van Winkle wrote:If Comcast doesn't want gun owners money then don't give them any.
Problem solved.
Except when they own a franchise that's a monopoly in your area for broadband Internet access.
When Qwerst pissed me off for the last time I looked into Comcast. After realizing they were no better, I went with Clear.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 26 guests