I find it funny that the pink pony would defend sharia. He could be the first stoned to death, once the caliphate is upon us.
Can anyone name a current religion other than Islam that wants to kill non-believers?
infidel wrote:I find it funny that the pink pony would defend sharia. He could be the first stoned to death, once the caliphate is upon us.
Can anyone name a current religion other than Islam that wants to kill non-believers?
XDM45 wrote:Christianity.
NMRMN wrote:XDM45 wrote:Christianity.
You're totally cracked. Just because people have committed crimes in the name of the faith, does not mean that is what the faith teaches.
XDM45 wrote:I don't care what any Religion or person/group/people/etc teaches, only what actions are done in the name of it/what they do.
NMRMN wrote:XDM45 wrote:I don't care what any Religion or person/group/people/etc teaches, only what actions are done in the name of it/what they do.
Fair enough. Then you should say, "Christians" -- not Christianity.
NMRMN wrote:XDM45 wrote:Christianity.
You're totally cracked. Just because people have committed crimes in the name of the faith, does not mean that is what the faith teaches.
goalie wrote:Totally cracked is pretending that you are not ignoring HUGE sections of your magic book. Again, do I need to start quoting the old testament?
goalie wrote:I disagree with both, but the former acting like the latter is "evil" seems pretty comical to me.
goalie wrote:NMRMN wrote:XDM45 wrote:Christianity.
You're totally cracked. Just because people have committed crimes in the name of the faith, does not mean that is what the faith teaches.
Totally cracked is pretending that you are not ignoring HUGE sections of your magic book. Again, do I need to start quoting the old testament?
I mean, objectively, what deserves more respect: the "religious" person who picks and chooses what part of the divinely inspired book they believe, or the one who believes ALL of their book?
I disagree with both, but the former acting like the latter is "evil" seems pretty comical to me.
XDM45 wrote:The problem with quoting the old testmeant or any of the books in the bible, is that there are many versions of it. Not to mention that none of the writers of any of the books in the bible were alive in the time of Jesus. For those writings/books, you need to look at the Gnostic Gospels and other heretical works which were banned and removed by the Council of Nicea I and II. Even so, all of the writings have been translated a few times from the original language into other langagues and then translated again, thus words which do not translate are missed, left out, mistranslated, etc. It's a bloody mess.
goalie wrote:NMRMN wrote:XDM45 wrote:Christianity.
You're totally cracked. Just because people have committed crimes in the name of the faith, does not mean that is what the faith teaches.
Totally cracked is pretending that you are not ignoring HUGE sections of your magic book. Again, do I need to start quoting the old testament?
I mean, objectively, what deserves more respect: the "religious" person who picks and chooses what part of the divinely inspired book they believe, or the one who believes ALL of their book?
I disagree with both, but the former acting like the latter is "evil" seems pretty comical to me.
infidel wrote:Wow. You keep bringing this up, without acknowledging the New Testament or reformation.
infidel wrote:There is only ONE worldwide "religion" that CURRENTLY advocates the death of non-believers. You keep trying to go back hundreds of years, ignoring the fact that all other mainstream religions are NOW peaceful.
I can provide you with names of hundreds, if not thousands of Imams, ayatollahs, mufti, and mullahs that want you DEAD.
How many "Christian", "Hindu", or "Jewish" leaders want non-believers dead?
A true follower of the warmongering child molester Mohammad, would aspire to be just like him.
Can anyone provide the name of religious leader of the following faiths that want you dead for not believing the way they do: Amish, Mormon, Jew, Hindu, Buddhist, Taoist, or Catholic, Lutheran etc?
goalie wrote:I just think the hypocrisy is a little much, especially when the hypocritical people would probably volunteer for one of those rides to block the Westboro Baptists from picketing a funeral...
NMRMN wrote:XDM45 wrote:The problem with quoting the old testmeant or any of the books in the bible, is that there are many versions of it. Not to mention that none of the writers of any of the books in the bible were alive in the time of Jesus. For those writings/books, you need to look at the Gnostic Gospels and other heretical works which were banned and removed by the Council of Nicea I and II. Even so, all of the writings have been translated a few times from the original language into other langagues and then translated again, thus words which do not translate are missed, left out, mistranslated, etc. It's a bloody mess.
Its all a conspiracy to get you to be Christian! Hahaha.
A staggering 100,000 Christians are killed annually because of their faith, according to the Vatican -- and several human rights groups claim such anti-Christian violence is on the rise in countries like Pakistan, Nigeria and Egypt.
"Credible research has reached the shocking conclusion that an estimate of more than 100,000 Christians are violently killed because of some relation to their faith every year," Vatican spokesman Monsieur Silvano Maria Tomassi said Tuesday in a radio address to the United Nations Human Rights Council.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 12 guests