ericinmn1970 wrote:steve4102 wrote:Texastransplant wrote:I couldn't care less if 99.9% of the great state of Minnesota voted to take every one of my firearms. It would still be wrong and they can come get them if they dare. Why? Because this isn't a pure democracy. We are a Republic in which certain rights are recognized, not granted, by our Constitution, one of which is to keep and bear arms, which shall not be infringed! Molon Labe!
No offence, but you sound just like the Union boys on the Iron Range with their Obama and Frankin bumper stickers plastered all over their vehicles. Any and all conversation with them about the 2nd Amendment, always starts and ends with " I'd like to see em try".
These are the same guys that still have the same box of 30-30 shells that they have had since, forever. Don't shoot, don't practice, don't care and can't hit ****. Beer bellied blowhards that will run for cover faster than fast if they actually ran into agents that, TRY.
Democrats, go figure.
It's not that I don't think that the folks proclaiming "Molon Labe" all over facebook and gun forums wouldn't put up a fight; it's that I think they would, foolishly, and then die alone in a pool of their own blood. That would serve little purpose as the media would portray "the lone gunman" as an anti-establishment kook. That likely won't start the "next revolution" either.
There doesn't need to be a revolution. It would be folly to attempt to fight the "government" or the troops/police. There is a more common sense approach. To target those, relatively few, legislators and judges who pass and uphold these treasonous and unconstitutional infringements. Those are the ones who need to be held accountable. It can even, perhaps, be settled in an afternoon. April 19th does have historical importance. (Let me be clear, so the NSA or any other government authority that is likely monitoring these topics- by targeted and held accountable I mean that these fine folks should get a good talking too. Preferably, not in front of their children)
