yukonjasper wrote:INOR wrote:No. The context of this is the kid actually threatening to shoot up the school. Cops have no choice but to react now, investigate, and take action. And what I’m saying is that, through the course of the investigation, if they find that the kid has access to guns, they will immediately assume the threat may have been credible. So lock your **** guns up if you have kids. It’s that **** simple.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I agree. I also agree with the police taking all of them out of the house. Clearly the parents didn't secure all the weapons proving themselves unable to handle the responsibility. Should they be able to get them back. The kid is only joking around until he isn't and he is wading through bodies. We can't have it both ways. Either we want a Crack down on the people who are making bad decisions or we acknowledge that all guns should be removed.
Play stupid games, win stupid prizes. Proud history of military service blah,blah,blah. Doing a tour in the military isn't a guarantee of super hero morals and ethics.
Less than 2 weeks ago a similar situation happened in a local school, where an autistic kid said something he shouldn't have.
Given what's been published about the actual dialog that took place here, one might reasonable think this kid was goaded into saying something that would have gotten the school closed for the day.
Granted, today, threats must be taken seriously, but with what has been observed as this happened, and what was learned in the past 18 hours, one can easily accuse the sheriff of grandstanding, overreacting, and over reaching beyond the law....
...unless you believe the sheriff should be allowed to arbitrarily confiscate firearms in a home.
Before this story started to unravel they were throwing around terms like 'arsenal, and 'cache of weapons'..'explosive devices'...
I believe the applicable law addresses loaded firearms accessible to children. And no such claim has been made by law enforcement.
Some of what occurred in this house appears stupid, and irresponsible, but I've yet to hear any clear example of a violation of law that warrants confiscation, and the family going to jail; inconveniently enough after the newspaper publishes the address and photo of their now unoccupied home.