FEDERAL COURT: SEMI-AUTOS ‘INDISTINGUISHABLE’ FROM M-16S

[Holland&Holland]

I don't suppose that the original intent of the Second Amendment to explicitly protect the possession of military arms will ever get a hearing?

One can hope.

[Ghost]

I don't suppose that the original intent of the Second Amendment to explicitly protect the possession of military arms will ever get a hearing?

One can hope.

That word has been ruined

[linksep]

I don't suppose that the original intent of the Second Amendment to explicitly protect the possession of military arms will ever get a hearing?

"A well regulated militia..." translated from 1791 to 2019 words reads: "A well-practiced civilian security-force".

[Holland&Holland]

I don't suppose that the original intent of the Second Amendment to explicitly protect the possession of military arms will ever get a hearing?

"A well regulated militia..." translated from 1791 to 2019 words reads: "A well-practiced civilian security-force".

Does not need to be translated in any way. “Shall not be infringed”.

[crbutler]

From reading this, she basically decided that the Brady folk’s brief was factual. She used their Brief as the definition of fact. She should get this bounced on appeal as the ATF is the legal source of these definitions for the USG. Typical liberal, emotions are every bit as valid as facts....

I would grant to gross visual examination at 30 feet, it’s pretty difficult to tell the difference between an AR 15 and an M16.

Of course, calling a dolphin a fish doesn’t make it so, either.

Sorry, but bad analogy. "Dolphin" Is A Fish...you may know it as "Mahi-Mahi", but it is a Dolphin. I have caught hundreds of them, and IMHO, they are best served Fried Golden Brown, with Hush Puppies and French Fries

Dolphin fish is different... probably why they call it Mahi Mahi. People can’t figure that out either.

And a dolphin is not the same as a porpoise, either.

[linksep]

I don't suppose that the original intent of the Second Amendment to explicitly protect the possession of military arms will ever get a hearing?

"A well regulated militia..." translated from 1791 to 2019 words reads: "A well-practiced civilian security-force".

Does not need to be translated in any way. “Shall not be infringed”.

Yeah, it does because all the anti-morons go: " Well regulated militia, that means the army with lots of regulations, they can keep their guns you can't". The anti-morons need to be ed-u-ma-cated that "regulated" means regularly practiced, and "militia" does not mean Army-Navy-Air Force; it means John Q. Public.

[Holland&Holland]

From reading this, she basically decided that the Brady folk’s brief was factual. She used their Brief as the definition of fact. She should get this bounced on appeal as the ATF is the legal source of these definitions for the USG. Typical liberal, emotions are every bit as valid as facts....

I would grant to gross visual examination at 30 feet, it’s pretty difficult to tell the difference between an AR 15 and an M16.

Of course, calling a dolphin a fish doesn’t make it so, either.

Sorry, but bad analogy. "Dolphin" Is A Fish...you may know it as "Mahi-Mahi", but it is a Dolphin. I have caught hundreds of them, and IMHO, they are best served Fried Golden Brown, with Hush Puppies and French Fries

Dolphin fish is different... probably why they call it Mahi Mahi. People can’t figure that out either.

And a dolphin is not the same as a porpoise, either.

Batter and deep fry any of them and I bet they taste great!

[BigDog58]

This is what a Bull Dolphin looks like. I've speared many of them. Every one, was a wild rush and loads of fun. Notice the Sagassum Weeds, right when the "schoolie" dolphin are getting caught. Starts at about 12:30 into the video.

I always kept a power head for discouraging the Bull Sharks