Federal Judge Upholds California ‘Ghost Gun’ Ban, Rules Gun-

Discussion of firearm-related news stories. Please use "Off Topic" for non-firearm news.
Forum rules
Do NOT post the full text of published articles. If you would like to discuss a news story please link to it and, at most, include a brief summary of the article.

Federal Judge Upholds California ‘Ghost Gun’ Ban, Rules Gun-

Postby jdege on Fri Oct 28, 2022 7:30 am

https://thereload.com/federal-judge-upholds-california-ghost-gun-ban-rules-gun-making-not-protected-by-second-amendment/
Federal Judge Upholds California ‘Ghost Gun’ Ban, Rules Gun-Making Not Protected by Second Amendment
California’s attempt to stop people from building their own firearms can move forward.

That’s the decision federal district judge George H. Wu, a George W. Bush appointee, delivered late last week. Wu determined the Second Amendment’s text does not cover the building of firearms, ruling against gun-mill maker Defense Distributed (DD) in its challenge of AB 1621. The judge argued California’s law banning the possession of unserialized firearms, as well as parts or specific tools used to make them, does not run afoul of gun-rights protections under the Supreme Court’s Bruen decision.

“Though it leads with a recognition of the primacy of Bruen’s ‘plain text’ point, DD seeks in its opening brief to jump ahead in the analysis to a historical/tradition assessment (and to jump ahead in Bruen to that decision’s discussion of how to conduct such an assessment),” Judge Wu wrote in his ruling rejecting a request for a preliminary injunction against the law. “But it has effectively attempted to avoid the necessary threshold consideration – does the ‘Second Amendment’s plain text’ cover the issue here? No, it plainly does not. AB 1621 has nothing to do with ‘keep[ing]’ or ‘bear[ing]’ arms.”
User avatar
jdege
 
Posts: 4514 [View]
Joined: Sun Jul 29, 2007 10:07 am

Re: Federal Judge Upholds California ‘Ghost Gun’ Ban, Rules Gun-

Postby LarryFlew on Fri Oct 28, 2022 11:18 am

– does the ‘Second Amendment’s plain text’ cover the issue here? No, it plainly does not. AB 1621 has nothing to do with ‘keep[ing]’ or ‘bear[ing]’ arms.”

DUH, by that mindset buying any gun has nothing to do with keeping or bearing arms either??????????????????
If you're having second thoughts you're two ahead of most Democrats
User avatar
LarryFlew
 
Posts: 5133 [View]
Joined: Fri Jun 19, 2009 7:37 am
Location: Hamburg, MN - CZ fan - Class of 66 - USAF 66-70 - NRA life since 1970

Re: Federal Judge Upholds California ‘Ghost Gun’ Ban, Rules Gun-

Postby Holland&Holland on Fri Oct 28, 2022 5:04 pm

So we can keep and bear them just not make, them, buy them or otherwise acquire them?
User avatar
Holland&Holland
 
Posts: 12533 [View]
Joined: Mon Jan 12, 2009 9:17 am


Return to In The News

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 10 guests

cron