Here is something to be aware of. This could easily happen here.
https://www.westernjournal.com/emergenc ... rn-journal
Sent from my SM-S908U1 using Tapatalk
samginko wrote:I always wondered about the " insurrection".
OK, you lied about everything for past eight years, but you finally got one right.
Even though, FBI investigation showed no coordination and intent for "insurrection", hey you got this one right.
Even though, Harvard University study showed that protesters were there to address issues with election, you got it right this time.
Even though majority of Americans now believe "insurrection" to be another leftist hoax. Congrats for saving the republic.
But, I always wondered what would have happened after the "insurrection".
I don't know? I guess all the leftists would have just thrown their hands in the air and gave up.
Of course, Supreme Court would have said, looks good to us.
Hey, you Republicans, didn't you know you can't just challenge an election result. Only "insurrectionist" do that.
New Mexico Gov. Michelle Lujan Grisham (d) on Friday issued an emergency public health order that suspends the open and permitted concealed carry of firearms in Albuquerque for 30 days.
Rotary12 wrote:Remember, EO's are not laws and elected servants can't dictate to us outside of the legitimate legislative process.
Markemp wrote:samginko wrote:I always wondered about the " insurrection".
OK, you lied about everything for past eight years, but you finally got one right.
Even though, FBI investigation showed no coordination and intent for "insurrection", hey you got this one right.
Even though, Harvard University study showed that protesters were there to address issues with election, you got it right this time.
Even though majority of Americans now believe "insurrection" to be another leftist hoax. Congrats for saving the republic.
But, I always wondered what would have happened after the "insurrection".
I don't know? I guess all the leftists would have just thrown their hands in the air and gave up.
Of course, Supreme Court would have said, looks good to us.
Hey, you Republicans, didn't you know you can't just challenge an election result. Only "insurrectionist" do that.
Is this one of those "Who are you going to believe, me or your lying eyes" comments?
I'm pretty sure the Supreme Court did say the election looks good to them, including 60+ courts before them. The republicans did try to challenge the election. And some of them tried to overthrow the legitimately elected government. They are in the "find out" phase right now.
It's like the civil war. You don't get a participation trophy for attempting and failing. You go to jail.
Rotary12 wrote:Here is something to be aware of. This could easily happen here.
https://www.westernjournal.com/emergenc ... rn-journal
Sent from my SM-S908U1 using Tapatalk
Rip Van Winkle wrote:Thanks Brian!
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 32 guests