photogpat wrote:I'm going to attend the Community Meeting at St Thomas tonight.
I feel like more details about the shooter, .............
I hope they reveal as little as possible about the shooter's identity.
photogpat wrote:I'm going to attend the Community Meeting at St Thomas tonight.
I feel like more details about the shooter, .............
MJY65 wrote:photogpat wrote:I'm going to attend the Community Meeting at St Thomas tonight.
I feel like more details about the shooter, .............
I hope they reveal as little as possible about the shooter's identity.
MJY65 wrote:photogpat wrote:I'm going to attend the Community Meeting at St Thomas tonight.
I feel like more details about the shooter, .............
I hope they reveal as little as possible about the shooter's identity.
xd ED wrote:
^^^THIS^^^
If they opened the meeting to questions, it would be interesting to learn why they charged the accomplices as they did.
They are train wrecks in the making.
I suspect it will be a canned presentation to assure locals they are safe and the police have it all covered.
Were I in town tonight I might attend too.
But kids, the lessons to be learned are not complicated, not complicated at all. Don't steal cars. Don't rob people. Don't attempt to be courageous in the name of a ridiculous gang. Yes, it can be tough to keep your act together but never so tough that you resort to whimsical armed-robbery attempts. We have no evidence that these young men were quite literally hungry or desperate for anything.
They were ... playing gangster.
But when you play gangster you never know who you are going to run into, even at a confluence of bicyclists, joggers, stargazers and lovers, any one of which Broadbent could have been instead of a now lost soul.
photogpat wrote:I don't expect (or hope) we'll ever get the shooter's identity.
Squib Joe wrote:photogpat wrote:I don't expect (or hope) we'll ever get the shooter's identity.
There is more than a slim chance that somebody on this forum knows this guy or that he is a member here himself. I would hope that we all respect his need for privacy and safety above all.
3. Personal information about others must remain private. If the information about a member is not contained in their profile then it is considered private.
yukonjasper wrote:Worse than Heather and crew, this person will be under constant threat of retribution. It's part of the twisted thug life gangsta "code". It doesn't matter if your homey was in the wrong, someone has to pay.
Senior Cmdr. Paul Iovino, in charge of the police department's western district, said .....
...it's clear gang activity had a lot to do with the incident last week as well as an incident Sunday night in which shots were fired during a vigil at the monument for Broadbent, the 16-year-old West St.
Paul boy who was killed and who was reportedly a member of the Shoota Boys Gang.
Iovino elicited gasps from the crowd when he revealed that the shots Sunday were fired not at the vigil but from the vigil. He said someone in the crowd saw a car approaching, mistook it for a rival gang member's car and opened fire. He said it turned out the car was driven by a friend bringing music to the vigil. No one was injured.
photogpat wrote:SPPD are guarding the shooter's ID (and other victim) vigilantly due to "numerous death threats". As they should.
They will NOT be charging the accomplices with felony homicide.
For some reason...
Squib Joe wrote:photogpat wrote:I don't expect (or hope) we'll ever get the shooter's identity.
There is more than a slim chance that somebody on this forum knows this guy or that he is a member here himself. I would hope that we all respect his need for privacy and safety above all.
Residents also questioned and criticized the role of guns in the incident. Some asked whether the owner of the gun Broadbent got from a stolen car should be held responsible. Others asked questions about the man who killed Broadbent, such as whether he lived in the neighborhood, how many shots he fired and whether Broadbent lowered his gun before the man shot him.
BigBlue wrote:From that same article:Residents also questioned and criticized the role of guns in the incident. Some asked whether the owner of the gun Broadbent got from a stolen car should be held responsible. Others asked questions about the man who killed Broadbent, such as whether he lived in the neighborhood, how many shots he fired and whether Broadbent lowered his gun before the man shot him.
Un-f-ing-believable!! What kind of mindset is that?? Hold the guy whose property was stolen responsible for what happened to it? That's some clear thinking.
How about holding the punks who stole it responsible? And the punks who robbed people? They are the ******** problem.
Users browsing this forum: Majestic-12 [Bot] and 1 guest