Emmer concedes

Discussion of firearm-related news stories. Please use "Off Topic" for non-firearm news.
Forum rules
Do NOT post the full text of published articles. If you would like to discuss a news story please link to it and, at most, include a brief summary of the article.

Emmer concedes

Postby rugersol on Wed Dec 08, 2010 11:56 am

from http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2010/12/08/source-emmer-concede-minn-gov-race/ ...
Far from a polished speaker, Dayton's supporters point instead to his stiff resolve and call-it-like-it-is approach. Some Democrats cringed at Dayton's loud call for an income tax increase, but he never wavered on it.


Apparently this is what the majority of Minnesotans wanted. Image
"as to the Colt's Commander, a pox on you for selling this after I made the house payment." - Pete RIP
"I, for one, welcome our new Moderator Overlords ..." - Squib Joe
User avatar
rugersol
 
Posts: 5691 [View]
Joined: Fri Jun 04, 2010 6:33 am

Re: Emmer concedes

Postby danscrapbags on Wed Dec 08, 2010 12:01 pm

:( :(
Dan Hefta Pres. MAPSA
http://www.mapsa-uspsa.com
User avatar
danscrapbags
 
Posts: 298 [View]
Joined: Mon Nov 22, 2010 7:29 am
Location: Wyoming, MN

Re: Emmer concedes

Postby Heffay on Wed Dec 08, 2010 12:03 pm

ahrens wrote:Apparently this is what the majority of Minnesotans wanted. Image


A plurality, not a majority.

Dayton will probably go down in history as the worst governor we've ever had. But he's still better than Emmer. ;)
To the two forum members who have used lines from my posts as their signatures, can't you quote Jesse Ventura or some other great Minnesotan instead of stealing mine? - LePetomane
User avatar
Heffay
 
Posts: 8842 [View]
Joined: Wed Jun 16, 2010 11:39 am

Re: Emmer concedes

Postby rugersol on Wed Dec 08, 2010 12:07 pm

Heffay wrote:Dayton will probably go down in history as the worst governor we've ever had.

No question! Image
"as to the Colt's Commander, a pox on you for selling this after I made the house payment." - Pete RIP
"I, for one, welcome our new Moderator Overlords ..." - Squib Joe
User avatar
rugersol
 
Posts: 5691 [View]
Joined: Fri Jun 04, 2010 6:33 am

Re: Emmer concedes

Postby chudrockz on Wed Dec 08, 2010 1:04 pm

I've found that Republicans in the legislature tend to recall that they are, in fact, FOR "limited government" much more with a Democrat exec than one of their own.
chudrockz
 
Posts: 719 [View]
Joined: Mon May 10, 2010 8:19 pm

Re: Emmer concedes

Postby Pat Cannon on Wed Dec 08, 2010 1:16 pm

chudrockz wrote:I've found that Republicans in the legislature tend to recall that they are, in fact, FOR "limited government" much more with a Democrat exec than one of their own.

Go gridlock!
User avatar
Pat Cannon
 
Posts: 3894 [View]
Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 2:32 pm
Location: South Minneapolis

Re: Emmer concedes

Postby Heffay on Wed Dec 08, 2010 1:18 pm

Pat Cannon wrote:
chudrockz wrote:I've found that Republicans in the legislature tend to recall that they are, in fact, FOR "limited government" much more with a Democrat exec than one of their own.

Go gridlock!


Now that is something EVERYONE can agree on! At least here. ;)
To the two forum members who have used lines from my posts as their signatures, can't you quote Jesse Ventura or some other great Minnesotan instead of stealing mine? - LePetomane
User avatar
Heffay
 
Posts: 8842 [View]
Joined: Wed Jun 16, 2010 11:39 am

Re: Emmer concedes

Postby bensdad on Wed Dec 08, 2010 1:43 pm

Heffay wrote:
Pat Cannon wrote:
chudrockz wrote:I've found that Republicans in the legislature tend to recall that they are, in fact, FOR "limited government" much more with a Democrat exec than one of their own.

Go gridlock!


Now that is something EVERYONE can agree on! At least here. ;)


Amen!
I got nothin'
bensdad
 
Posts: 2113 [View]
Joined: Wed Jul 23, 2008 3:07 pm
Location: Lakeville

Re: Emmer concedes

Postby ComradeBurg on Wed Dec 08, 2010 3:04 pm

Pat Cannon wrote:
chudrockz wrote:I've found that Republicans in the legislature tend to recall that they are, in fact, FOR "limited government" much more with a Democrat exec than one of their own.

Go gridlock!


+1

Although I have to say it's sad that gridlock is the best we can hope for.
Check out my Truth About Guns podcast at http://truthaboutguns.com/

Also check out my blog at http://blog.christopherburg.com/
User avatar
ComradeBurg
 
Posts: 754 [View]
Joined: Wed Jan 14, 2009 10:00 pm
Location: Minnetonka

Re: Emmer concedes

Postby princewally on Wed Dec 08, 2010 4:53 pm

ComradeBurg wrote:
Pat Cannon wrote:
chudrockz wrote:I've found that Republicans in the legislature tend to recall that they are, in fact, FOR "limited government" much more with a Democrat exec than one of their own.

Go gridlock!


+1

Although I have to say it's sad that gridlock is the best we can hope for.


That's the best form of government. Shoot, the federal government was designed that way.
Of the people, By the People, For the People. The government exists to serve us, not the reverse.
User avatar
princewally
 
Posts: 1995 [View]
Joined: Wed Jul 25, 2007 7:32 pm
Location: st louis park

Re: Emmer concedes

Postby Holland&Holland on Wed Dec 08, 2010 5:28 pm

That is what you get when you put a DUI forward as your best option for governer. Get quality canidate first and then lets talk. IMHO
User avatar
Holland&Holland
 
Posts: 12657 [View]
Joined: Mon Jan 12, 2009 9:17 am

Re: Emmer concedes

Postby diskdoctr on Wed Dec 08, 2010 7:32 pm

With an 8700 vote deficit I don't see how Emmer had any choice. Considering that, I think he did right thing.
User avatar
diskdoctr
 
Posts: 846 [View]
Joined: Sun May 24, 2009 3:51 pm
Location: Northwest Suburbs

Re: Emmer concedes

Postby Tommy Gun on Wed Dec 08, 2010 7:42 pm

Gee, I thought Emmer was going to hold out so that T-Paw could stay on as the Guv and the Eeeeee-vil Republicans could carry out their dastardly plan to take over Minnesota, then the USA and eventually the whole world. Bwahhhhh-ha-ha-ha-ha!! :roll:

Holland&Holland wrote:That is what you get when you put a DUI forward as your best option for governer. Get quality canidate first and then lets talk. IMHO


I will admit that I was not happy that Emmer had a DUI arrest in his past because I knew that would be a political problem. However, that was 20+ freakin' years ago, not 20 weeks or months ago. Sure, it hurt Emmer, but that is not why he lost. He lost because of ingrates like Arne Carlson, Al Quie and Dave Durenberger, et al. They decided to publicly support a candidate from another party because their guy didn't win the party nomination. When political parties pick a candidate, there is always someone who isn't happy. That's the way it goes. Grown ups will suck it up and support the party nominee so they can keep the other party from winning. These guys aren't novices in party politics. If they don't want to support the party, they can proclaim their independence and go it alone . . . or join another party.
When you are on the horns of a dilemma, shoot the bull right between the eyes.
User avatar
Tommy Gun
 
Posts: 559 [View]
Joined: Tue Sep 08, 2009 5:13 am
Location: TC Metro Area: South-ish

Re: Emmer concedes

Postby 1911fan on Wed Dec 08, 2010 7:57 pm

Arnie, Al and Dave are already feeling the no love from the party, above and beyond the pale of getting booted. All three have lost significant consultant contracts over this, and will loose a lot more. Likewise some of the others who joined in on the horner support are now finding that plum jobs that would have been theirs for the asking are drying up, and they have been tainted by this and the people in the know are saying, very long memories over this.

Re Emmer's DUI, it was in college. I hate to say it, but if you had to look at everyone who went to college and examined their behaviors when in college, No one would get elected. From the sexual harrassment of dorm raids, convincing semi willing young wimin that "nah, there's no booze in here" to the contests of drinking, events on spring break,etc, its all apart of growing up. I have the "it happened in college" rule. If it happened there, its a non starter. Why? because if we based life outcomes on what we did in college, my doctor would be working at MickeyD's, my Banker would be at menards and several others would be in jail, self included. More than likely, most of us never want to find out what our spouses did in college either...

Every time someone brings up Emmers DuI, I ask, but Dayton was DRUNK on the senate floor, particularly during the debates on the responses to 9-11. How many lives did he endanger by being unable and unwilling to effectively evaluate what was the best response to the Attacks on the USA?

Which do you think is a larger risk, a guy who got a DUI and learned from it, or a practicing Drunk who also has admitted to severe Depression and appears to have other mental illness's besides?
User avatar
1911fan
 
Posts: 6545 [View]
Joined: Thu Jul 26, 2007 1:56 pm
Location: 35 W and Hwy 10

Re: Emmer concedes

Postby Holland&Holland on Wed Dec 08, 2010 7:59 pm

Tommy Gun wrote:Gee, I thought Emmer was going to hold out so that T-Paw could stay on as the Guv and the Eeeeee-vil Republicans could carry out their dastardly plan to take over Minnesota, then the USA and eventually the whole world. Bwahhhhh-ha-ha-ha-ha!! :roll:

Holland&Holland wrote:That is what you get when you put a DUI forward as your best option for governer. Get quality canidate first and then lets talk. IMHO


I will admit that I was not happy that Emmer had a DUI arrest in his past because I knew that would be a political problem. However, that was 20+ freakin' years ago, not 20 weeks or months ago. Sure, it hurt Emmer, but that is not why he lost. He lost because of ingrates like Arne Carlson, Al Quie and Dave Durenberger, et al. They decided to publicly support a candidate from another party because their guy didn't win the party nomination. When political parties pick a candidate, there is always someone who isn't happy. That's the way it goes. Grown ups will suck it up and support the party nominee so they can keep the other party from winning. These guys aren't novices in party politics. If they don't want to support the party, they can proclaim their independence and go it alone . . . or join another party.


Plenty of folks in this state who do not drink and drive. Non-starter in my book. I do not care if it was 50 years ago. Not gubinitorial material. Find someone else.
User avatar
Holland&Holland
 
Posts: 12657 [View]
Joined: Mon Jan 12, 2009 9:17 am

Next

Return to In The News

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 8 guests

cron