DeanC wrote:Under the proposed bill, existing magazines would be grandfathered but it would be illegal to sell them or give them away after the effective date.
Pre‐Enactment Devices
Prohibits the transfer or import (but not possession) of large capacity ammunition feeding devices manufactured before the date of enactment of this bill
Exemptions
Allows for the following exemptions to the ban (identical to the original law): o Active law enforcement
o Protection of nuclear materials o Retiredlawenforcementfordevicestransferredtothematretirement o Authorized testing or experimentation
Major changes from the ’94 law:
Prohibits the importation of the devices Bans the transfer of devices in existence before the enactment of the bill (allows for
continued possession)
tazdevil wrote: This still looks like knee-jerk reactionism to a tragedy instead of thinking things through.
crbutler wrote:About this time frame I began to look on Glock owners as being incestuous relatives of Lucifer.
jdege wrote:DeanC wrote:Under the proposed bill, existing magazines would be grandfathered but it would be illegal to sell them or give them away after the effective date.
The way I read the bill, it would ban any firearm with an internal magazine of more than ten rounds, except for tubular magazine .22s.
http://carolynmccarthy.house.gov/uploads/mccarthy-magazine_bill.pdf
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 9 guests