Rushed New York magazine laws fails to exempt Police

Discussion of firearm-related news stories. Please use "Off Topic" for non-firearm news.
Forum rules
Do NOT post the full text of published articles. If you would like to discuss a news story please link to it and, at most, include a brief summary of the article.

Rushed New York magazine laws fails to exempt Police

Postby Nat on Thu Jan 17, 2013 4:01 pm

“My daughter is a New York City police officer, and under this legislation, we’ll be taking bullets out of her gun while the bad guys have no such limitations,” said Graf. “This is what happens when you circumvent the legal, responsible legislative process: you end up with a well-intentioned bill that completely misses its mark and ends up putting the safety of our children and families at risk.”


http://www.algraf.org/2013/01/15/graf-r ... -gun-bill/
Secrets are the opposite of Freedoms
User avatar
Nat
 
Posts: 522 [View]
Joined: Mon Jul 06, 2009 1:57 pm
Location: center metro

Re: Rushed New York magazine laws fails to exempt Police

Postby Rip Van Winkle on Thu Jan 17, 2013 4:17 pm

What's good enough for us peasants is good enough for the ruling class if you ask me.
I will never apologize for being an American.
Post 435 Gun Club
North Star Rifle Club
cmpofficer@post435gunclub.org
DR #2673
President's Hundred (#48 2018)
Certified NRA RSO
User avatar
Rip Van Winkle
 
Posts: 4234 [View]
Joined: Thu Jul 26, 2007 5:04 pm
Location: Unfashionable end of the western spiral arm, Galaxy Milky Way

Re: Rushed New York magazine laws fails to exempt Police

Postby Dill on Thu Jan 17, 2013 4:18 pm

but Bloomy and Cuomo said it would make us safer! what a joke.
Dill
 
Posts: 256 [View]
Joined: Fri Dec 16, 2011 11:49 am
Location: Lino Lakes

Re: Rushed New York magazine laws fails to exempt Police

Postby Heffay on Thu Jan 17, 2013 4:21 pm

Dill wrote:but Bloomy and Cuomo said it would make us safer! what a joke.


It will. Have you seen cops shoot? Fewer bullets is probably a good thing. 8-)
To the two forum members who have used lines from my posts as their signatures, can't you quote Jesse Ventura or some other great Minnesotan instead of stealing mine? - LePetomane
User avatar
Heffay
 
Posts: 8842 [View]
Joined: Wed Jun 16, 2010 11:39 am

Re: Rushed New York magazine laws fails to exempt Police

Postby Scoobyvroom on Thu Jan 17, 2013 6:50 pm

Heffay wrote:
Dill wrote:but Bloomy and Cuomo said it would make us safer! what a joke.


It will. Have you seen cops shoot? Fewer bullets is probably a good thing. 8-)



Here I thought it was from the required 12lb trigger....
User avatar
Scoobyvroom
 
Posts: 58 [View]
Joined: Thu Nov 03, 2011 6:21 am

Re: Rushed New York magazine laws fails to exempt Police

Postby CUZICAN on Thu Jan 17, 2013 6:51 pm

i believe they refer to something like this as an "unintended consequence".

I can't wait to see the hypocrisy when they have to change the law to exempt law enforement - probably be done under the cover of darkness.
"Tyranny is defined as that which is legal for the government but illegal for the citizenry."

"The beauty of the second amendment is that it will not be needed until they try to take it"
CUZICAN
 
Posts: 70 [View]
Joined: Sat Nov 03, 2012 3:24 pm
Location: Northern MN

Rushed New York magazine laws fails to exempt Police

Postby JP5EDC on Thu Jan 17, 2013 6:56 pm

This is beautiful!
JP5EDC
 
Posts: 79 [View]
Joined: Tue Jul 31, 2012 1:41 pm

Re: Rushed New York magazine laws fails to exempt Police

Postby mc762x54R on Thu Jan 17, 2013 8:23 pm

NY really sucks...idiots
User avatar
mc762x54R
 
Posts: 298 [View]
Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2010 6:56 pm

Re: Rushed New York magazine laws fails to exempt Police

Postby AFTERMATH on Thu Jan 17, 2013 8:38 pm

It seems they want to fix this to exempt not only current but retired law enforcement....

How many brand new LEO's will work for a week and retire to get around this law?
RWVA Senior Instructor -- http://www.RWVA.org
User avatar
AFTERMATH
 
Posts: 570 [View]
Joined: Wed Nov 04, 2009 3:25 pm
Location: Somewhere in the state of Minnesota

Re: Rushed New York magazine laws fails to exempt Police

Postby whiteox on Thu Jan 17, 2013 9:51 pm

Another story. The hypocrisy is staggering. Bunch of "I'm the only person in this room responsible enough to . . . BOOM"

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/01/17/ny-gun-control-laws-anger-police-retired_n_2495417.html
whiteox
 
Posts: 507 [View]
Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2010 9:13 pm

Re: Rushed New York magazine laws fails to exempt Police

Postby tman on Fri Jan 18, 2013 12:21 am

AFTERMATH wrote:It seems they want to fix this to exempt not only current but retired law enforcement....

How many brand new LEO's will work for a week and retire to get around this law?



I think ten years is the magic number to be considered "retired" by the federal law.

whiteox wrote:Another story. The hypocrisy is staggering. Bunch of "I'm the only person in this room responsible enough to . . . BOOM"

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/01/17/ny-gun-control-laws-anger-police-retired_n_2495417.html


Michael J. Palladino, who is head of the NYPD’s 6,000-member detectives union and president of the state’s association of Patrolmen Benevolent Association which represents 50,000 members, joined in calling for Cuomo and the legislature to immediately amend the law.

“Gun reform must prevent criminals and the deranged from getting illegal weapons — not restrict law-abiding retired cops from protecting themselves and the public,” Palladino said.

“I support the governor in gun reform, however the new legislation restricts law enforcement officers who retire and that could jeopardize the safety of the public.”


Makes me want to vomit. sigh.
Badged Thug & MN Permit to Carry Instructor
Slowly growing 1911 Glock collection. Donations accepted
User avatar
tman
 
Posts: 2981 [View]
Joined: Sat Sep 29, 2007 9:25 pm
Location: Centrally isolated in Northern MN

Re: Rushed New York magazine laws fails to exempt Police

Postby cs tunes on Fri Jan 18, 2013 6:04 am

I'm confused, isn't a reited police officer a "regular citizen" at the point where they are no longer an employee? Hmmmm.......sounds fishy.
cs tunes
 
Posts: 91 [View]
Joined: Sun Nov 11, 2012 4:31 pm

Re: Rushed New York magazine laws fails to exempt Police

Postby EAJuggalo on Fri Jan 18, 2013 7:40 am

except that anyone who meets the federal government's definition of "retired LEO" and puts just a little effort into it is allowed to carry everywhere in the country under HR 218.
"The democracy will cease to exist when you take away from those who are willing to work and give to those who are not". - Thomas Jefferson
User avatar
EAJuggalo
 
Posts: 1457 [View]
Joined: Thu Jul 26, 2007 10:54 pm
Location: Oshkosh, WI

Re: Rushed New York magazine laws fails to exempt Police

Postby Rip Van Winkle on Fri Jan 18, 2013 8:29 am

Retired LEO's are probably still union members and because the democrat party is bought and paid for by government unions they will get anything they demand.
I will never apologize for being an American.
Post 435 Gun Club
North Star Rifle Club
cmpofficer@post435gunclub.org
DR #2673
President's Hundred (#48 2018)
Certified NRA RSO
User avatar
Rip Van Winkle
 
Posts: 4234 [View]
Joined: Thu Jul 26, 2007 5:04 pm
Location: Unfashionable end of the western spiral arm, Galaxy Milky Way

Re: Rushed New York magazine laws fails to exempt Police

Postby Heffay on Fri Jan 18, 2013 8:46 am

Should also make an exemption for military vets too. :D
To the two forum members who have used lines from my posts as their signatures, can't you quote Jesse Ventura or some other great Minnesotan instead of stealing mine? - LePetomane
User avatar
Heffay
 
Posts: 8842 [View]
Joined: Wed Jun 16, 2010 11:39 am

Next

Return to In The News

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 10 guests

cron