California Passes Ammo Permit Fee, This Sucks

Discussion of firearm-related news stories. Please use "Off Topic" for non-firearm news.
Forum rules
Do NOT post the full text of published articles. If you would like to discuss a news story please link to it and, at most, include a brief summary of the article.

California Passes Ammo Permit Fee, This Sucks

Postby george on Mon Jun 17, 2013 5:27 pm

Hope this wasn't already posted, didn't see it.

Every time an individual buys a box of ammo, they must submit personal information for review and pay a $50 permit fee. After the private details and money has been paid, the state will then, and only then, decide if the customer will be allowed to put the ammunition into a sack and walk out of the store. The same day purchase of ammunition in California may be a thing of the past, depending upon how long it takes for the background results to return.

http://www.offthegridnews.com/2013/06/13/breaking-california-passes-ammo-permit-fee/

Looks like a lot of of road trips will be necessary for ammo. (out of state)

I jest hope this isn't the start of another fight every where.
Last edited by george on Mon Jun 17, 2013 6:49 pm, edited 1 time in total.
"If the personal freedoms guaranteed by the Constitution inhibit the government's ability to govern the people, we should look to limit those guarantees."
-- President Bill Clinton, August 12, 1993
User avatar
george
 
Posts: 696 [View]
Joined: Thu Apr 03, 2008 4:34 pm
Location: Minnesota

Re: California Passes Ammo Permit Fee, This Sucks

Postby shooter115 on Mon Jun 17, 2013 5:40 pm

It's bad, but not as bad as the story makes it sound. You have to pay $50 annually, not for every box of ammo. It's a ******** bill, but the author should do a little bit of research before "reporting".
shooter115
 
Posts: 1734 [View]
Joined: Thu Sep 08, 2011 2:25 pm
Location: Morris, MN

Re: California Passes Ammo Permit Fee, This Sucks

Postby bofe954 on Mon Jun 17, 2013 6:33 pm

Illinois has a FOID that's about the same. It's cheaper though.
bofe954
 
Posts: 141 [View]
Joined: Thu May 15, 2008 10:08 am

Re: California Passes Ammo Permit Fee, This Sucks

Postby BBeckwith on Mon Jun 17, 2013 7:47 pm

As I read the law the $50 is for a business to get the permit to sell. The $ amount for the buyer did not list a $ amount just a fee that must not be more then a reasonable cost to process the permit. I am assuming that it being California they will jack it as high as possible. It is possible that I missed the end user cost as well
The IQ of a mob is the IQ of its dumbest member, divided by the number of people in it.
User avatar
BBeckwith
 
Posts: 1082 [View]
Joined: Sat Sep 19, 2009 10:33 am

Re: California Passes Ammo Permit Fee, This Sucks

Postby infidel on Mon Jun 17, 2013 8:04 pm

This is all about the ruling class preventing the poor from defending themselves. (read Hispanic, Black, ANY minority, and old people).

Jim Crow?

Real "Progressives" would never stand for it.
“If you have a problem, if no one else can help, and if you can find them, maybe you can hire the A-Team.” - John Ashley

Disclaimer: Do not assume from this post, that I either agree or disagree with any other issue brought up in this thread.
User avatar
infidel
 
Posts: 2103 [View]
Joined: Tue Jan 27, 2009 9:34 pm

Re: California Passes Ammo Permit Fee, This Sucks

Postby TH3180 on Mon Jun 17, 2013 8:08 pm

infidel wrote:This is all about the ruling class preventing the poor from defending themselves. (read Hispanic, Black, ANY minority, and old people).

Jim Crow?

Wait a minute. I'm a poor, white 30 something......... Er, I reload. So screw them. Oh, and went to school after I high school. So I guess I'm really not that po....... Never mind, carry on. 8-)
MrVvrroomm wrote:What time is lunch? I'm having a colonoscopy that morning at 1000. I'm sure I'll be hungry.
User avatar
TH3180
 
Posts: 2322 [View]
Joined: Wed Aug 25, 2010 9:43 am
Location: Prior Lake

Re: California Passes Ammo Permit Fee, This Sucks

Postby Deputyhiro on Mon Jun 17, 2013 8:09 pm

infidel wrote:This is all about the ruling class preventing the poor from defending themselves. (read Hispanic, Black, ANY minority, and old people).

Jim Crow?

Real "Progressives" would never stand for it.


Kinda like voter ID keeps minorities and poor from voting? ;)
It is better to have a gun and not need it, than to need a gun and not have it.
User avatar
Deputyhiro
 
Posts: 412 [View]
Joined: Mon Apr 08, 2013 5:40 pm
Location: Between a rock.... And a hard place

Re: California Passes Ammo Permit Fee, This Sucks

Postby westhope on Mon Jun 17, 2013 8:24 pm

Kinda like voter ID keeps minorities and poor from voting?


Like needing to showing proof of citizenship to register to vote. Latest SCOTUS opinion.
Because I care, I carry.
HOPE for the best in people, but PLAN for the worst.
User avatar
westhope
 
Posts: 1721 [View]
Joined: Sat Jul 28, 2007 8:55 am
Location: West of Hope, MN. (South Central MN)

Re: California Passes Ammo Permit Fee, This Sucks

Postby mrp on Mon Jun 17, 2013 9:09 pm

BBeckwith wrote:As I read the law the $50 is for a business to get the permit to sell. The $ amount for the buyer did not list a $ amount just a fee that must not be more then a reasonable cost to process the permit. I am assuming that it being California they will jack it as high as possible. It is possible that I missed the end user cost as well


(2) The applicant shall be approved or denied within 30 days of the date of the application. If the application is denied, the department shall state the reasons for doing so and provide the applicant an appeal process to challenge that denial.

(g) The department shall recover the reasonable cost of administering this section by charging applicants an initial application and a renewal application fee.

(j) The department shall annually review and shall adjust the fees specified in subdivision (h) (g), if necessary, to fully fund, but not to exceed the reasonable costs of, the permit ammunition authorization program provided by this section, including the enforcement of this program.

So...
Year 1. Charge some not too obscene fee. Say, $50. Deny. Deny. Deny. Deny. Make folks spend money appealing. Fight each appeal all the way. Spend as much money as possible. Budget an obscene amount for enforcement. Spend. Spend. Spend.

Year 2. Add up all the expenditures from year 1. Divide by number of people who applied the previous year. Holy crap, it's $10,000 per applicant. Only 1000 people will apply if we do that. Yes, so we need to charge each of those people $100,000. Holy Crap! Nobody's going to pay that much! Good.
User avatar
mrp
 
Posts: 960 [View]
Joined: Wed Jan 13, 2010 10:54 am

Re: California Passes Ammo Permit Fee, This Sucks

Postby TommyMN on Tue Jun 18, 2013 2:50 pm

Deputyhiro wrote:
infidel wrote:This is all about the ruling class preventing the poor from defending themselves. (read Hispanic, Black, ANY minority, and old people).

Jim Crow?

Real "Progressives" would never stand for it.


Kinda like voter ID keeps minorities and poor from voting? ;)


Negative tower. Beleive the hype thou
TommyMN
 
Posts: 599 [View]
Joined: Mon Apr 04, 2011 11:06 am
Location: Oakdale


Return to In The News

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests

cron