People Have A 'Fundamental Right' To Own Assault Weapons, Co

Discussion of firearm-related news stories. Please use "Off Topic" for non-firearm news.
Forum rules
Do NOT post the full text of published articles. If you would like to discuss a news story please link to it and, at most, include a brief summary of the article.

People Have A 'Fundamental Right' To Own Assault Weapons, Co

Postby Spartan on Thu Feb 04, 2016 9:18 pm

In a major victory for gun rights advocates, a federal appeals court on Thursday sided with a broad coalition of gun owners, businesses and organizations that challenged the constitutionality of a Maryland ban on assault weapons and other laws aimed at curbing gun violence.


A three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 4th Circuit said the state's prohibition on what the court called "the vast majority of semi-automatic rifles commonly kept by several million American citizens" amounted to a violation of their rights under the Constitution.

"In our view, Maryland law implicates the core protection of the Second Amendment -- the right of law-abiding responsible citizens to use arms in defense of hearth and home," Chief Judge William Traxler wrote in the divided ruling.


http://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/people ... spartandhp
User avatar
Spartan
 
Posts: 1076 [View]
Joined: Sun Oct 31, 2010 10:22 pm
Location: Plymouth Rock

Re: People Have A 'Fundamental Right' To Own Assault Weapons, Co

Postby LarryP on Fri Feb 05, 2016 4:06 pm

:bravo:
LarryP
 
Posts: 1180 [View]
Joined: Mon Jan 10, 2011 3:57 pm

Re: People Have A 'Fundamental Right' To Own Assault Weapons, Co

Postby Jackpine Savage on Sat Feb 06, 2016 6:49 am

I sure hope it stands.
User avatar
Jackpine Savage
 
Posts: 1708 [View]
Joined: Sat Feb 09, 2008 8:45 am
Location: west central MN

Re: People Have A 'Fundamental Right' To Own Assault Weapons, Co

Postby Lumpy on Sat Feb 06, 2016 6:32 pm

As I heard it, the ruling states that any restrictions on guns must pass a "Strict Scrutiny" test- the level of protection accorded to freedom of speech, assembly and the press. IOW, the government finally has to admit that the 2nd really is part of the "Bill of Rights".

Of course since this is contradicted by other district rulings, it just means it might eventually go to the Supreme Court- which despite Heller and McDonald has been extraordinarily reluctant to question states' long-standing restrictions on firearms.
User avatar
Lumpy
 
Posts: 2727 [View]
Joined: Sat Dec 28, 2013 2:54 pm
Location: North of Lowry, West of Penn


Return to In The News

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 24 guests

cron