SUPREME COURT GRANTS CERT IN HISTORIC EMPLOYEE FREEDOM CASE

Discussion of firearm-related news stories. Please use "Off Topic" for non-firearm news.
Forum rules
Do NOT post the full text of published articles. If you would like to discuss a news story please link to it and, at most, include a brief summary of the article.

SUPREME COURT GRANTS CERT IN HISTORIC EMPLOYEE FREEDOM CASE

Postby jdege on Fri Sep 29, 2017 5:48 am

http://www.powerlineblog.com/archives/2017/09/supreme-court-grants-cert-in-historic-employee-freedom-case.php
SUPREME COURT GRANTS CERT IN HISTORIC EMPLOYEE FREEDOM CASE
Minnesota, where I live, is one of a number of states where public sector unions, especially teachers’ unions, are by far the most powerful political force. Conservatives who rely on voluntary contributions cannot begin to match the enormous revenues the teachers’ unions extract by force from people who are legally compelled to pay them. If the Supreme Court sides with the Janus plaintiffs, the political landscape in such states will be transformed.

The unions believe such a result is highly probable, which accounts for their hysteria. Our Never Trump friends should acknowledge that if Hillary Clinton had won the election, she would have appointed a justice to succeed Antonin Scalia who would have voted to keep public employees in a state of involuntary servitude to the unions, and the Democratic Party, forever.


This could be a big deal, if SCOTUS does to the public employee unions here what was done to them in Wisconsin.
User avatar
jdege
 
Posts: 4482 [View]
Joined: Sun Jul 29, 2007 10:07 am

Re: SUPREME COURT GRANTS CERT IN HISTORIC EMPLOYEE FREEDOM CASE

Postby LarryP on Fri Sep 29, 2017 2:30 pm

How is it gun related?
LarryP
 
Posts: 1180 [View]
Joined: Mon Jan 10, 2011 3:57 pm

Re: SUPREME COURT GRANTS CERT IN HISTORIC EMPLOYEE FREEDOM CASE

Postby jdege on Sun Oct 01, 2017 4:04 am

The teachers unions are the 800 pound gorilla in Minnesota politics.

Everything changes, if they cannot spend the money they extort on their favorite progressive causes.

Prior to the 2003 shall-issue permit law it was legal for permit holders to carry in schools. The provision in the law that forbade carry was added as a part of a compromise with the teachers unions - they promised they would not oppose the bill if the provision was added.

We added the provision, they opposed the bill, anyway.
User avatar
jdege
 
Posts: 4482 [View]
Joined: Sun Jul 29, 2007 10:07 am


Return to In The News

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 13 guests

cron