MJY65 wrote:^^^^^^
On what basis? Sounds like she was a crappy employee on several levels. I don't want having a PTC to be used as a protected class by crappy employees any more than I want them to play the race, age or gender card to avoid being fired.
I’d like to know when they discovered she had her CCW. I’ll bet it’s immediately prior to the October date they started creating this CYA paper trail to build a case about how she was such a terrible employee. Yes, I know it’s an employment at will state, but that’s not protection against human rights violations or Constitutional infringements. Especially at a government institution.
I’m sure there’s internal memos and/or incriminating emails about the companies motives that would be revealed during discovery. Time will tell. If she’s lying, she won’t pursue legal action. If she does, she should continue getting the benefit of the doubt until the facts prove otherwise.