Page 2 of 5
Re: N.J. Police Refuse to Rule Out Door-to-Door Disarmament
Posted:
Fri Dec 14, 2018 11:32 amby Holland&Holland
yukonjasper wrote:I guess the State of New Jersey has decided they want to test the resolve of Gun owners. I can't imagine door to door going well, more likely will be a surgical approach with its foundations being a database of some kind being made available "for the good od public safety and to potect our brave Law Enforcement officers who are just doing their job ". If we save just one life.............
I am guessing most will turn them in pretty quickly after the first few arrests.
Re: N.J. Police Refuse to Rule Out Door-to-Door Disarmament
Posted:
Fri Dec 14, 2018 11:40 amby xd ED
Might be a wise thing for NJ gun owners to make friends with people in other states...or better yet join them.
Re: N.J. Police Refuse to Rule Out Door-to-Door Disarmament
Posted:
Fri Dec 14, 2018 11:49 amby Ghost
xd ED wrote:Might be a wise thing for NJ gun owners to make friends with people in other states...or better yet join them.
Or challenge them
Re: N.J. Police Refuse to Rule Out Door-to-Door Disarmament
Posted:
Fri Dec 14, 2018 12:01 pmby Citiot
That address looks to be a commercial building. Former sub sandwich shop or something.
Looks to be a troll.
Re: N.J. Police Refuse to Rule Out Door-to-Door Disarmament
Posted:
Fri Dec 14, 2018 12:06 pmby hard h2o
In other magazine bans I believe they have had wording that excludes tubular magazines. That would allow you to keep the tube magazine rimfires and the like.
If I read that correct tube magazines are included in this law.
Re: N.J. Police Refuse to Rule Out Door-to-Door Disarmament
Posted:
Fri Dec 14, 2018 12:18 pmby Ghost
Citiot wrote:That address looks to be a commercial building. Former sub sandwich shop or something.
Looks to be a troll.
Donut shop
Re: N.J. Police Refuse to Rule Out Door-to-Door Disarmament
Posted:
Fri Dec 14, 2018 12:18 pmby xd ED
Ghost wrote:xd ED wrote:Might be a wise thing for NJ gun owners to make friends with people in other states...or better yet join them.
Or challenge them
Or stop for coffee...
Re: N.J. Police Refuse to Rule Out Door-to-Door Disarmament
Posted:
Fri Dec 14, 2018 8:12 pmby Grayskies
Re: N.J. Police Refuse to Rule Out Door-to-Door Disarmament
Posted:
Fri Dec 14, 2018 8:37 pmby Ghost
Grayskies wrote:DuZqh_HXgAAWKSJ.jpeg
Is that legit?
Re: N.J. Police Refuse to Rule Out Door-to-Door Disarmament
Posted:
Fri Dec 14, 2018 8:43 pmby Grayskies
Ghost wrote:Grayskies wrote:DuZqh_HXgAAWKSJ.jpeg
Is that legit?
It was a retweet of a tweet, I would think its legit, but it is off the internet.
Re: N.J. Police Refuse to Rule Out Door-to-Door Disarmament
Posted:
Fri Dec 14, 2018 8:58 pmby xd ED
Checking the official website, that document is not there. This is the most recent directive from that office; similar, but different. I'm no handwriting expert, but the sigs look different...
Re: N.J. Police Refuse to Rule Out Door-to-Door Disarmament
Posted:
Fri Dec 14, 2018 9:02 pmby Grayskies
I looked at other documents he signed, and they are closer to what I posted. Well I am sure we will find out sooner or later...
New Jersey Bans Police From Possessing Duty Weapons While Off Duty
https://defensemaven.io/bluelivesmatter ... 4_V350zFQ/
Re: N.J. Police Refuse to Rule Out Door-to-Door Disarmament
Posted:
Fri Dec 14, 2018 9:39 pmby Citiot
Police officers are civilians.
All new gun laws should apply to both on-duty, off-duty and retired police officers. No exceptions.
Re: N.J. Police Refuse to Rule Out Door-to-Door Disarmament
Posted:
Fri Dec 14, 2018 9:40 pmby Ghost
Citiot wrote:Police officers are civilians.
All new gun laws should apply to both on-duty, off-duty and retired police officers. No exceptions.
Agree
Re: N.J. Police Refuse to Rule Out Door-to-Door Disarmament
Posted:
Fri Dec 14, 2018 9:43 pmby Grayskies
Ghost wrote:Citiot wrote:Police officers are civilians.
All new gun laws should apply to both on-duty, off-duty and retired police officers. No exceptions.
Agree
I also agree!