https://www.latimes.com/politics/la-na- ... story.html
In response to Sandy Hook shooting..
Scary implications here.
yukonjasper wrote:https://www.latimes.com/politics/la-na-newtown-shooting-court-remington-20190314-story.html
I response to Sandy Hook shooting..
Scary implications here.
yukonjasper wrote:The goal of the left is to deplete the resources and force bankruptcy even if they know the idea is not correct, they can kill businesses with frivolous lawsuits.
yukonjasper wrote:The problem is that the companies that get named have to expend resources to defend themselves until they get a US Supreme Court hearing. The goal of the left is to deplete the resources and force bankruptcy even if they know the idea is not correct, they can kill businesses with frivolous lawsuits.
crbutler wrote:It’s a very limited ruling.
The sale of the gun is not the issue, but rather the advertising campaign is the issue here. If they can prove that Remington/Bushmaster deliberately targeted a group that would be known to cause trouble just to sell more, they have grounds.
I’m a little torn... if this wins and passes muster, it would dramatically reduce all the advertising we are exposed to on a daily basis, not guns, but food, alcohol, movies, etc.
crbutler wrote:It’s a very limited ruling.
The sale of the gun is not the issue, but rather the advertising campaign is the issue here. If they can prove that Remington/Bushmaster deliberately targeted a group that would be known to cause trouble just to sell more, they have grounds.
I’m a little torn... if this wins and passes muster, it would dramatically reduce all the advertising we are exposed to on a daily basis, not guns, but food, alcohol, movies, etc.
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 8 guests