Zimmerman Prosecutors Deny the Undeniable As Lawsuit Proceed

Discussion of firearm-related news stories. Please use "Off Topic" for non-firearm news.
Forum rules
Do NOT post the full text of published articles. If you would like to discuss a news story please link to it and, at most, include a brief summary of the article.

Zimmerman Prosecutors Deny the Undeniable As Lawsuit Proceed

Postby jdege on Tue Apr 14, 2020 11:18 am

https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2020/04/zimmerman_prosecutors_deny_the_undeniable_as_lawsuit_proceeds.html
Zimmerman Prosecutors Deny the Undeniable As Lawsuit Proceeds
In the way of background, Zimmerman is charging that Trayvon Martin’s support team, including Martin’s parents and their attorney Benjamin Crump, knowingly substituted an imposter witness for the real “phone witness” in order to secure Zimmerman’s arrest for the 2012 shooting death of Trayvon Martin

[...]

Like Guy, de la Rionda pleads incompetence. Among other failures, he admits he did not “verify that Rachel Jeantel was Diamond Eugene as she had claimed.” Nor did he “attempt to verify that the voice, tone, and inflections of the 16- year-old girl named Diamond who was recorded in the roughly 20 minute phone interview conducted by Benjamin Crump on March 19, 2012 matched the voice, tone, and inflections of 18-year-old Rachel Jeantel in your recorded interview on April 2, 2012 and her later statements.”

Had de la Rionda simply chalked his poor performance up to carelessness or indifference, he would have been on relatively safe ground legally. Inexplicably, however, he waded into some seriously murky waters.

When asked whether he investigated the discrepancies between what the real Diamond Eugene said during a March 19 phone call and what Rachel Jeantel said under oath during an April 2 interview, de la Rionda’s attorney responded for him, “de la Rionda denies that he recorded an interview of Rachel Jeantel on or about April 2, 2012.”

This undeniably false claim was made twice in de la Rionda’s official “Response to Request for Admissions.” Nor was he using the word “recorded” to evade responsibility. In response to another question, de la Rionda denied that he “conducted the April 2, 2012, interview.” The interview was audiotaped. I have listened to it many times myself and read the transcript. I do not know who pushed the “record” button, but de la Rionda surely conducted it.
User avatar
jdege
 
Posts: 2475 [View]
Joined: Sun Jul 29, 2007 10:07 am

Re: Zimmerman Prosecutors Deny the Undeniable As Lawsuit Proceed

Postby Ghost on Tue Apr 14, 2020 11:53 am

Image
User avatar
Ghost
 
Posts: 8073 [View]
Joined: Wed Feb 05, 2014 8:49 pm

Re: Zimmerman Prosecutors Deny the Undeniable As Lawsuit Proceed

Postby Ironbear on Tue Apr 14, 2020 1:38 pm

I wonder if, 2,000 years from now... they will be reading "The Saga of Zimmerman"?
"Justice and power must be brought together, so that whatever is just may be powerful, and whatever is powerful may be just.” ~Blaise Pascal~
User avatar
Ironbear
 
Posts: 2015 [View]
Joined: Sat Jul 28, 2007 4:38 pm
Location: A nondescript planet in the Milky Way galaxy

Re: Zimmerman Prosecutors Deny the Undeniable As Lawsuit Proceed

Postby Holland&Holland on Tue Apr 14, 2020 1:48 pm

Wow. What a goat rodeo.
User avatar
Holland&Holland
 
Posts: 9115 [View]
Joined: Mon Jan 12, 2009 9:17 am

Re: Zimmerman Prosecutors Deny the Undeniable As Lawsuit Proceed

Postby Ghost on Wed Apr 15, 2020 1:00 pm

Apparently if you watch the movie linked below it’s supposed to be very eye opening to all the stuff that they did in order to get Zimmerman.

https://www.amazon.com/Trayvon-Hoax-Unmasking-Witness-Divided/dp/B07XQRHSBV
User avatar
Ghost
 
Posts: 8073 [View]
Joined: Wed Feb 05, 2014 8:49 pm


Return to In The News

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests

cron