by Ironbear on Sun Dec 20, 2020 1:24 pm
Not sure if Ohio still would be the best place to go. I remember Ohio being specifically mentioned in Andrew Branca's book, The Law of Self-Defense, so I went looking.
To paraphrase, in forty-nine states, the prosecutor has the responsibility of "burden of proof" for self-defense cases. The prosecution must prove "beyond a reasonable doubt" that it wasn't self-defense; and then prove "beyond a reasonable doubt" that a crime was committed, to prosecute. In Ohio, the burden lies with the defendant, who has to prove "by a preponderance of evidence" (more likely than not) that it was self-defense. [Law of Self-Defense, Andrew Branca, 2017, pg. 36]
I don't know if anything has changed since the 2017 issue of my copy, but them having to "prove that you are guilty"; would be better than you having to "prove you are innocent" .
I don't know if this law has broader implications than "stand your ground", but the new law may be an effort to bring Ohio law into closer conformance with the rest of the country.
"Justice and power must be brought together, so that whatever is just may be powerful, and whatever is powerful may be just.” ~Blaise Pascal~