Markemp wrote:jdege wrote:But banning lead shot? It's a proposal that indicates severe ignorance about what the actual problem is.
Mr Strawser, what is the MNGOC's position on this bill?
Here is some interesting info. Non-lead primers are a thing too. Is this proposed law also requiring non-lead primers along with the steel shot?
https://www.cdph.ca.gov/Programs/CCDPHP ... azards.pdf
https://epi.dph.ncdhhs.gov/oee/oii/docs ... tsheet.pdfRecovering lead bullets from
traps and emptying bullet trays can release dust
into the air and contaminate hands. Handling spent
cartridges and cleaning firearms can do the same.
Lead dust and fumes emitted into the air are a
hazard. A building’s regular HVAC system may not
adequately remove airborne lead particles and these
particles can be inhaled. Lead dust can also settle on
food, water, cloths, shoes, nearby surfaces and even
travel to other rooms. You can ingest lead when you
touch a lead-contaminated surface, then eat, drink or
smoke. Lead dust is hard to see and can be tracked
out of the range area on shoes and clothing. This can
lead to contamination of your vehicle and home and
can expose members of your household.
Seems to me the dangers of lead can come from a variety of sources, so minimizing its use at the trap range is a smart idea. Opposing this seems more like the conclusion you would reach after long term lead exposure.
We oppose this bill.
