SBR legality question for member

Discussion of rifles, shotguns, and muzzleloaders

SBR legality question for member

Postby Bessy on Mon Nov 29, 2010 10:50 am

A member of the forum contacted me with a question I'm ill -equipped to answer, so I'm posting it here.

Hello Sir,

I am looking to getting a SBR when I move back to MN in a few weeks.

I used to live in Oakdale and tried to get a SBR but the city ordanace did not allow short rifles. So when I move back I am going to be avoiding Oakdale. I need to live near Minneapolis so if you know of places that a more SBR friendly then others please advise.


Quite frankly this scares the **** out of me. I didn't even realize cities restricted ownership of sbr's. I'm wondering if I could get nicked for being in possession of an sbr within city limits. Anyone know which cities near the Minneapolis are sbr friendly?
In Soviet Russia program executes you!
User avatar
Bessy
 
Posts: 1485 [View]
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2009 7:14 pm
Location: Rochester, MN

Re: SBR legality question for member

Postby Squib Joe on Mon Nov 29, 2010 11:10 am

I wonder if there is an actual ordinance or is it just a Chief that doesn't like to sign off on forms. If there is an ordinance, preemption laws may also apply and it may not be valid.
Last edited by Squib Joe on Mon Nov 29, 2010 11:27 am, edited 2 times in total.
"The weight is a sign of reliability. I always go for reliability." - Boris "The Blade" Yurinov
User avatar
Squib Joe
 
Posts: 2778 [View]
Joined: Tue Aug 07, 2007 8:15 pm
Location: Minneapolis

Re: SBR legality question for member

Postby Boone on Mon Nov 29, 2010 11:15 am

Ordinance

"Sec. 13-8. Possession of Certain Items Prohibited. No person, unless specifically permitted under
the terms of either a valid state or federal firearms license or collector’s permit, shall possess any of the
following:
(a) Fully automatic firearms.
(b) Shot guns with a barrel length less than eighteen (18) inches.
(c) Rifles with a barrel length less than sixteen (16) inches.
(d) Weapons made from a rifle or shotgun with an overall length of less than twenty-six (26)
inches.
(e) Semi-automatic pistols with shoulder stocks.
(f) Any unconventional weapon which is capable of being fired and can be concealed on the
person."
"Once a Marine, always a Marine...

...why re-enlist?"
Boone
 
Posts: 100 [View]
Joined: Thu Nov 18, 2010 7:17 pm
Location: Vadnais Heights, MN

Re: SBR legality question for member

Postby forcefed on Mon Nov 29, 2010 11:20 am

Put a longer flash hider on it? I think they need to be staked in place though, so they can't come off.
User avatar
forcefed
 
Posts: 741 [View]
Joined: Sat Feb 27, 2010 2:40 pm
Location: East Bethel

Re: SBR legality question for member

Postby Squib Joe on Mon Nov 29, 2010 11:26 am

471.633 FIREARMS.

The legislature preempts all authority of a home rule charter or statutory city including a city of the first class, county, town, municipal corporation, or other governmental subdivision, or any of their instrumentalities, to regulate firearms, ammunition, or their respective components to the complete exclusion of any order, ordinance or regulation by them except that:

(a) a governmental subdivision may regulate the discharge of firearms; and

(b) a governmental subdivision may adopt regulations identical to state law.

Local regulation inconsistent with this section is void.
"The weight is a sign of reliability. I always go for reliability." - Boris "The Blade" Yurinov
User avatar
Squib Joe
 
Posts: 2778 [View]
Joined: Tue Aug 07, 2007 8:15 pm
Location: Minneapolis

Re: SBR legality question for member

Postby Bessy on Mon Nov 29, 2010 12:21 pm

Squib Joe wrote:471.633 FIREARMS.

The legislature preempts all authority of a home rule charter or statutory city including a city of the first class, county, town, municipal corporation, or other governmental subdivision, or any of their instrumentalities, to regulate firearms, ammunition, or their respective components to the complete exclusion of any order, ordinance or regulation by them except that:

(a) a governmental subdivision may regulate the discharge of firearms; and

(b) a governmental subdivision may adopt regulations identical to state law.

Local regulation inconsistent with this section is void.



This is all well and good, but do you really want to be the guy that has to fight it in court after the cops confiscate your weapons and try to throw you in jail.
In Soviet Russia program executes you!
User avatar
Bessy
 
Posts: 1485 [View]
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2009 7:14 pm
Location: Rochester, MN

Re: SBR legality question for member

Postby Squib Joe on Mon Nov 29, 2010 1:37 pm

Bessy wrote:
Squib Joe wrote:471.633 FIREARMS.

The legislature preempts all authority of a home rule charter or statutory city including a city of the first class, county, town, municipal corporation, or other governmental subdivision, or any of their instrumentalities, to regulate firearms, ammunition, or their respective components to the complete exclusion of any order, ordinance or regulation by them except that:

(a) a governmental subdivision may regulate the discharge of firearms; and

(b) a governmental subdivision may adopt regulations identical to state law.

Local regulation inconsistent with this section is void.



This is all well and good, but do you really want to be the guy that has to fight it in court after the cops confiscate your weapons and try to throw you in jail.


Hell no. The other problem is that Minnesota doesn't exactly allow SBRs - they don't forbid them either, so the preemption statutes may mean squat.

If it were me, I'd ask for a sit down with the CLEO and plead your case before moving in. I don't think I'd move to a different city just to own a SBR
"The weight is a sign of reliability. I always go for reliability." - Boris "The Blade" Yurinov
User avatar
Squib Joe
 
Posts: 2778 [View]
Joined: Tue Aug 07, 2007 8:15 pm
Location: Minneapolis

Re: SBR legality question for member

Postby miked on Mon Nov 29, 2010 7:06 pm

Remember a city ordinance violation is only a misdemeanor (state law) which means its only a citaiton unless they can show reason for one of the exceptions.
miked
 
Posts: 37 [View]
Joined: Tue May 25, 2010 3:11 pm

Re: SBR legality question for member

Postby Snowgun on Mon Nov 29, 2010 7:18 pm

Boone wrote:Ordinance

"Sec. 13-8. Possession of Certain Items Prohibited. No person, unless specifically permitted under
the terms of either a valid state or federal firearms license or collector’s permit, shall possess any of the
following:
(a) Fully automatic firearms.
(b) Shot guns with a barrel length less than eighteen (18) inches.
(c) Rifles with a barrel length less than sixteen (16) inches.
(d) Weapons made from a rifle or shotgun with an overall length of less than twenty-six (26)
inches.
(e) Semi-automatic pistols with shoulder stocks.
(f) Any unconventional weapon which is capable of being fired and can be concealed on the
person."


:shock:

So I put a shoulder stock on my 1911 and it's illegal? wut?
Victory is reserved for those who are willing to pay its price. - Sun Tzu

The Way is in training... Do nothing which is not of value. - Miyamato Musashi

One who knows the Self puts death to death. - Upanishads
User avatar
Snowgun
Events Coordinator
 
Posts: 3368 [View]
Joined: Sun Mar 28, 2010 11:06 pm
Location: Watching my CZ Catch the Sunlight!

Re: SBR legality question for member

Postby Ken on Tue Nov 30, 2010 9:35 am

Snowgun wrote:
Boone wrote:Ordinance

"Sec. 13-8. Possession of Certain Items Prohibited. No person, unless specifically permitted under
the terms of either a valid state or federal firearms license or collector’s permit, shall possess any of the
following:
(a) Fully automatic firearms.
(b) Shot guns with a barrel length less than eighteen (18) inches.
(c) Rifles with a barrel length less than sixteen (16) inches.
(d) Weapons made from a rifle or shotgun with an overall length of less than twenty-six (26)
inches.
(e) Semi-automatic pistols with shoulder stocks.
(f) Any unconventional weapon which is capable of being fired and can be concealed on the
person."


:shock:

So I put a shoulder stock on my 1911 and it's illegal? wut?


Browning Hi-Power is a classic example of a pistol with a shoulder stock, but then again most of those would fall under C&R rules.

Also, AK47 pistols, AR pistols, etc come to mind.
User avatar
Ken
 
Posts: 108 [View]
Joined: Sun Sep 19, 2010 3:48 pm
Location: Coon Rapids


Return to Long Guns

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest

cron