by EJSG19 on Tue Feb 01, 2011 10:41 pm
This issue is about as easy to prove 100% that one method is best, as...
.45 acp is better than .40 short and wimpy and 9mm (it is!)
Glocks are better than 1911's... and everything else (they are!)
Especially since one never has the hindsight to test the rifle in both pre break in and post break in, so there are never conclusive results. Can't even test two identical rifles side by side... we all know each gun is different right?
The best part is, some of the more vocal folks on one side or another don't really know why they think what they think. Its just what they think. Barrel break in, whether it helps or not, can't really hurt anything if done properly. So its good peace of mind. Then at least if your rifle is a poor shooter, you can't say you didn't try your best. On the other hand, inevitably somebody will have a great shooting rifle, that never went through a "break in". Hence the two-sided, never ending debate. Enjoy.
Now where did that AR vs. AK thread go?
EJSG19
"Cum catapultae proscriptae erunt tum soli proscript catapultas habebunt."