LongRange wrote:yes.
And that is its weight when it leaves the rifle? You are not adding any tip to increase the weight and BC? The total weight of your .695 BC projectile is 120gr?
LongRange wrote:yes.
LongRange wrote:Lost River J36 135gr B.C .7351 @3000 fps
Matrix VLD 165gr B.C .7381 @2800 fps
Matrix VLD 175gr B.C .7828 @2700fps
Not sure why it is hard to understand a solid round 120-140 gr @4000 fps having a B.C of .7 area.. these are examples that DO exists and I have fired. The Matrix rounds I have found to be very satisfactory in accuracy. The LR's as well but a barrel length of over 30" and trist rate of 11 is needed. Hope this helps, If not then I guess theres no hope.
Rip Van Winkle wrote:You see, here is the dirty little secret, bullet manufactures, especially custom manufactures, lie about their numbers. They're also basing their numbers on the outdated and unrealistic G1 model instead of the newer and more realistic G7 model. Berger bullets recently downgraded their BC numbers based on the new G7 model, unfortunately they still need to publish the old G1 numbers. Marketing being what marketing is.
Berger Bullets
Snowgun wrote: I know Sam and Ragged say it's all about the BC and such but I'll remain in the speed demon camp, since I only play in the 0-600 yrd kiddy pool.
Rip Van Winkle wrote:I read somewhere years ago that an additional BC of .005 was worth the equivalent of 100fps muzzle velocity. I'm not sure I agree with those numbers but it gives a good idea of the importance of ballistic coefficients and why the bullet manufactures lie about their numbers. It's important to remember that there is no magic pixie dust one can sprinkle on a bullet to give it a higher BC, if a manufacturer's numbers seem high they probably are.
Snowgun wrote:So, how does one then determine actual bc? With speed and various drops at range? Entered into a regression algorithm?
RAGGED wrote:All this talk of crazy BC's really has me itching to put a new 7.5 twist bbl on my TRG so I can run some 1.174BC GS pills, coming out at 2750FPS would be plenty nice for those windy days up at Harris, sure it would drop out of the 1.174 range pretty fast (300 yards) but it would still be pulling over 1.0 all the way to 2350yds, 27.2" of drift @ 1000 with a 10mph cross.
Rip Van Winkle wrote:Unless their lying about their numbers.
RAGGED wrote:Rip Van Winkle wrote:Unless their lying about their numbers.
at over $2 a pop they better not be!
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 9 guests