farmerj wrote:I am going to echo what V-man said.
Sell it and get a mil-dot scope if you want to have a scope that's capable of being used for hold overs.
No matter what you get a spot-on turret for, you won't be any good with it except at the specifications you gave it. There is a reason it is asking you for atmospheric conditions and why you are inputting them.
You best thing to do is get a mil-dot scope like a 6X super sniper and go buy yourself a ton of ammo.
Then you sit down on the range with a spotting scope, your rifle, your pen, your ammo and you shoot.
And with every shot, you log what it did for you in a book. To include: sky, temp, cloudy, humidty, wind, pressure, trace etc.
There is a reason that long range and competitive shooters use a log book. Because it can't be beat. Mil-dots help a little bit to deal with hold-overs. But it still comes to the skill of know what the external ballistics is doing to the gun.
So with that in mind.
What is the spec's on the scope for the rifle, ammo, temp, humidity, pressure and have you taken the difference for what all those were calibrated for and made the adjustments to the time/date/conditions for when you zero'ed your rifle?
This is kinda like telling your wife to sell the minivan, buy a Porsche, and go to the track to practice over and understeering so she can get the kids to school in a 5 second window.
The OP just wants a scope that can get her within one minute of Yote, QUICKLY with MINIMAL THINKING AND CALCULATION (i.e., not mil dot), out to about 400 yrds or so. Hold over reticules are perfect for this (assuming you get them set up correctly). They will even function with a variety of ammo and conditions.
Now what you say about practicing is worthwhile, but the OP really only needs to do some work on trigger control, range estimation, and sighting in the rifle. This will be enough to have the system that she already has perform to her specifications (i.e., banging Yotes).