SSBotanyBay wrote:I have been doing a bit or research as well so this thread has helped quite a bit. Thanks.
As of right now I am pretty much sold on a falling-block action. Anybody have any complaints with the Ruger No.1 in 45-70?
No complaints about the strength of the Ruger #1 action; the very hottest .45-70 loads in the reloading manual are often intended for it, by name.
Just one anecdotal thing, which is that a friend of mine bought one a number of years ago (out of the WalMart at the Coon Rapids/Anoka border, which hasn't sold guns in how long?) and reported that it kicked the dogsnot out of him with even the wimpy factory loads. Probably just a matter of the stock dimensions not matching up to his proportions in some manner that exagerated the recoil effect, but figured it was worth mention. The same guy was using a .338 mag. for all his hunting not too long ago, so I don't think it was a matter of his being a wuss about getting kicked.
OTOH over a quarter century ago, I had a .45-70 Ruger #3, which looked like the bastard offspring of a #1 and a 10/22 carbine. Liked it a lot, as it was short, handy and accurate, but my usual stupid self got distracted by some flashy thing or other and traded it off many moons ago. I recall it had a healthy kick with 300gr JHP factory loads, but nothing to be afraid of or even that noteworthy in comparison with other cartridges found in lightweight rifles.