Hmac wrote:t140 wrote:
Remington no longer holds the contract. Colt petitioned the US Army's decision and the top competitors from the last bid are rebidding.
Is that info more recent than the November GAO ruling?
http://militarytimes.com/blogs/gearscou ... his-be-it/
If so, what a circus the govt bidding process is. No wonder US forces are
still using a 40 year old platform.
I hadn't seen your article yet. I read the one they wrote a month before. But the way I read the article you pointed out, it sounds like The Army is set again to award a new contract. It doesn't state who won it. But it does state that Remington is still under a stop order.
Looks like Remington might win, but who knows.
