JoeH wrote:indeed_mandy wrote:What parts would you need to buy before the ban went into place (if it goes into place) and what parts should still be available post ban.
I know this is speculation, but I wasn't in the paying the least bit of attention during the last ban.
I would also be interested in a "building class" or whatever. Or at least building it or parts of it with some one.
Have a good one,
indeed
It will depend on the terms of the ban. Many people are caught up in getting lowers before a potential ban. The lower has the serial number and is considered to be the "gun".
However, I have it from a reliable source that the gun should be assembled before a ban goes into place to be legal. So, buying a lower before a ban, then buying an upper after a ban goes into effect and assembling the rifle may be illegal.
If he's correct you'll want to have receipts for the lower, upper, and lower parts before a ban goes into effect.
If the hypothetical ban is either nearly identical, or more restrictive than the last ban then the difference between an assembled "pre-ban rifle" and an unassembled lower is the that stripped lower will be considered a "post ban rifle" reguardless of when the reciever was machined. I don't foresee extra loopholes being added to the hypothetical ban to allow for stripped recievers to retain pre-ban status.
Edward M. Owen, Jr., Chief of the Firearms Technology Branch of the BATF, has this to say:
"...The fact that the receiver may have been manufactured prior to September 13, 1994, is immaterial to classification of a weapon as a semiautomatic assault weapon. Additionally, payment or non-payment of excise tax is also immaterial to classification of a firearm as a semiautomatic assault weapon."
What he's reiterating is, as far as pre-ban and post-ban is concerned, the date of manufacture of the receiver has nothing to do with anything. If your [Semiautomatic Assault Weapon] was built into a whole SAW, or in a complete kit form, before Sept. 13, 1994 (The Date), you are the lucky owner of a pre-ban receiver. Notice I say SAW. The existence of firearm alone is not enough - it had to be in a form that would now be illegal to manufacture. If the gun was built after The Date, if the receiver was without all of the parts to make a SAW before The Date, or if it was not in a SAW form before The Date, then it is post-ban. Let me give you a few examples to clarify this:
The only loophole reguarding home-built firearms I see in the '94 ban is that unlike the Hughes Amendment to the "Firearm Owners Protection Act (which required machine guns be fully assembled to be considered transferable), if you were in possesion of all the peices of a "kit" firearm it was not subject to the '94 ban if assembled post-ban. This technicality may not be present in a future bill.
http://www.olyarms.com/index.php?Itemid=42&id=28&option=com_content&task=viewamong other sources...
On the subject of stocks: For me it's a no-brainer. I'd prefer the cheaper and more durable fixed stocks than the cheaply made telescopic ones I've tried. The last one I shot was was extra flimsy and it bugged the stuffing out of me. The owner barely comes up to my chest so it's understandable he wanted something that was adjustable. It sounds like you're building on the cheap Strad so I'd say go with the fixed stock for now, unless you're too short for even an A1 stock.